Личный кабинет

One of the Common Mistakes when Building Objects in Cluttered Urban Environment

Number of journal: 1-2-2020
Autors:

Sokolov N.S.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2020-1-2-25-30
УДК: 624

 

AbstractAbout AuthorsReferences
The construction of facilities in cluttered urban conditions requires a special approach related to the need to develop and implement measures to ensure accident-free operation of buildings of the surrounding development within the geotechnical influence limits. Often, builders neglect the influence of the technology of construction of a new object on possible negative defects (cracks appeared on the facades due to uneven settlements, tilts, etc.) of the buildings being operated. Until now, the concept of «minimum price» is exaggerated when building the part of the building below the zero mark, ignoring the technical feasibility. At the same time, builders go to any tricks to reduce the cost. Such «irrational» method of construction ultimately could lead to a significant cost increase in construction of the zero part of the building and, as a rule, to an increase in the period of construction (approval of the new project as a result of replacement with another geotechnical technology, passing the new construction expertise). A negative case from the geotechnical practice of construction of a 16-storey residential building next to the existing five-storey residential building is considered.
N.S. SOKOLOV, Candidate of Sciences (Engineering) (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)

I.N. Ulianov Chuvash State University (15, Moskovskiy pr., Cheboksary, 428015, Russian Federation)

1. Mangushev R.A., Nikiforova N.S., Konyushkov V.V., Osokin A.I. Proektirovanie i ustrojstvo podzemnyh sooruzhenij v otkrytyh kotlovanah [Design and construction of underground structures in open pits]. Moscow: ASV, 2013. 256 p.
2. Mangushev R.A., Veselov A.A., Konyushkov V.V., Sapin D.A. Numerical modeling of technological precipitation of neighboring buildings in the device trench “wall in the ground”. Vestnik grazhdanskih inzhenerov. 2012. No. 5 (34), pp. 87–98. (In Russian).
3. Makovetsky O.A., Zuev S.S., Khusainov I.I., Timofeev M.A. Ensuring geotechnical safety of the building under construction. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2014. No. 9, pp. 34–38. (In Russian).
4. Ilichev V.A., Konovalov P.A., Nikiforova N.S., Bulgakov L.A. Deformations of the Retaining Structures Upon Deep Excavations in Moscow. Proc. Of Fifth Int. Conf on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering, April 3–17, New York, 2004, pp. 5–24.
5. Ilyichev V.A., Nikiforova N.S., Koreneva E.B. Computing the evaluation of deformations of the buildings located near deep foundation tranches. Proc. of the XVIth European conf. on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering. Madrid, Spain, 24–27th September 2007 «Geo-technical Engineering in urban Environments». Vol. 2, рр. 581–585.
6. Nikiforova N.S., Vnukov D.A. Geotechnical cut-off diaphragms for built-up area protection in urban underground development. Proc. of the 7thI nt. Symp. “Geotechnical aspects of underground construction in soft ground». 16-18 May, 2011, tc28 IS Roma, AGI, 2011, No. 157 NIK.
7. Nikiforova N.S., Vnukov D.A. The use of cut off of different types as a protection measure for existing buildings at the nearby underground pipelines installation. Proc. of Int. Geotech. Conf. dedicated to the Year of Russia in Kazakhstan. Almaty, Kazakhstan, 23–25 September 2004, pp. 338–342.
8. Petrukhin V.P., Shuljatjev O.A., Mozgacheva O.A. Effect of geotechnical work on settlement of surrounding buildings at underground construction. Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. Prague, 2003.
9. Triantafyllidis Th., Schafer R. Impact of diaphragm wall construction on the stress state in soft ground and serviceability of adjacent foundations. Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Madrid, Spain. September, 22–27. 2007, рр. 683–688.
10. Ponomarev A.B. Geotechnical monitoring of a house. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2015. No. 9, pp. 41–46. (In Russian).
11. Sokolov N.S., Viktorova S.S., Fedorova T.G. Piles of increased bearing capacity. Materials of the 8th all-Russian (2nd International) conference “New in architecture, design of building structures and reconstruction” (NASKR-2014). 2014. Cheboksary: CSU, pp. 411–415. (In Russian).
12. Sokolov N.S. With., Rabinow V.M. Technology of the piles increased the bearing capacity. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2016. No. 9, pp. 11–14. (In Russian).
13. Sokolov N.S. With. Technological methods devices bored piles with multiple caps. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2016. No. 10, pp. 54–59. (In Russian).

For citation: Sokolov N.S. One of the common mistakes when building objects in cluttered urban environment. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2020. No. 1–2, pp. 25–30. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2020-1-2-25-30

Assessment of the Impact of Climate Change on the Energy Efficiency of Climate Control Systems of Buildings

Number of journal: 1-2-2020
Autors:

Samarin O.D.,
Lushin K.I.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2020-1-2-21-24
УДК: 699.86 : 697.1

 

AbstractAbout AuthorsReferences
The relevance of the study is related to the need to take into account climate changes in order to predict the structure of the building’s energy balance. The subject of the study is the dependence of energy consumption by building microclimate systems on the increase in the average annual temperature in the construction area. The purpose of the study is to estimate the total energy consumption for building climate control under conditions of a set degree of climate warming. The task of the study is to obtain a mathematical description of the annual change in outdoor temperature and analytical expressions for the duration of the heating and cooling periods and the degree-days for these periods. The representation of the annual course of the ambient air temperature in the form of harmonic oscillations with a certain average value and amplitude is used. By integrating this expression within the necessary limits, the dependencies for the degree-days of heating and cooling periods are obtained. Calculations based on these dependencies were made for the climatic conditions of Moscow within the limits of an increase in the average annual temperature by two degrees, and the results were analyzed. It is shown that under the conditions of the studied variant of climate parameters change, the decrease in energy consumption for building heating and heating of the inflow during the cold period is more significant than the increase in the consumption of cold for cooling in the summer. Therefore, under the conditions of Moscow, climate warming can lead to a decrease in the total annual energy consumption for providing the building’s microclimate.
O.D. SAMARIN, Candidate of Sciences (Engineering) (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.),
K.I. LUSHIN, Engineer

National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (26, Yaroslavskoe Highway, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation)

1. Gagarin V.G., Ivanov D.S., Malyavina E.G. The development of climatic information in the form of specialized “typical year”. Vestnik Volgogradskogo Architekturno-stroitelnogo Universiteta. Stroitelstvo i architektura. 2013. Vol. 31(50). Part 1, pp. 343–349. (In Russian).
2. Kryuchkova O.Yu. The engineering procedure of calculation of annual water and energy consumption by the central air conditioning units. Internet-vestnik VolgGASU. Ser.: Politematicheskaya. 2013. Vol. 4 (29). [Electronic resource]. System requirements: Windows 7. URL: http://vestnik.vgasu.ru /attachments/ Kryuchkova-2013_4(29).pdf. (In Russian).
3. Kobysheva N.V., Klyuyeva M.V., Kulagin D.A. Climatic risks of city heat supply. Trudy Glavnoy geofizicheskoy observatorii im. A.I. Voeykova. 2015. No. 578, pp. 75–85. (In Russian).
4. Valiño V., Rasheed A., Perdigones A., Tarquis A.M. Effect of increasing temperatures on cooling systems. A case study. European greenhouse sector. Climatic Change. 2014. Vol. 123. No. 2, pp. 175–187.
5. Wang X., Mei Y., Li W., Kong Y., Cong X. Influence of sub-daily variation on multi-fractal detrended analysis of wind speed time series. PLoS ONE. 2016. Vol. 11. No. 1, pp. 6014–6284.
6. Masson V. A physically-based scheme for the urban energy budget in atmospheric models. Boundary-Layer Meteorology. 2000. Vol. 94. No. 3, pp. 357–397.
7. Naji S., Alengaram U.J., Jumaat M.Z., Shamshir-band S., Basser H., Keivani A., Petković D. Application of adaptive neuro-fuzzy methodology for estimating building energy consumption. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2016. Vol. 53, pp. 1520–1528.
8. Hani A., Koiv T.-A. Energy Consumption Monitoring Analysis for Residential, Educational and Public Buildings. Smart Grid and Renewable Energy. 2012. No. 3. Vol. 3, pp. 231–238.
9. Samarin O.D. On verifying of probable and statistical correlation between design parameters of external climate. Izvestiya vuzov. Stroitel’stvo. 2014. No. 3, pp. 66–69. (In Russian)
10. Samarin O.D., Byzov N.I. Possibilities of the increase of the energy saving class by heat recovery in ventilating systems. SOK. 2017. No. 3, pp. 72–75. (In Russian)

For citation: Samarin O.D., Lushin K.I. Assessment of the impact of climate change on the energy efficiency of climate control systems of buildings. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2020. No. 1-2, pp. 21–24. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2020-1-2-21-24

Innovations in the Construction Industry as a Factor of Stable State of a Construction Enterprise

Number of journal: 1-2-2020
Autors:

Abramov I.L.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2020-1-2-16-20
УДК: 624.05

 

AbstractAbout AuthorsReferences
It is difficult to imagine the development and effective functioning of the construction industry without the introduction of innovative management, technical and technological solutions. The use of new materials and technologies contributes to the creation of popular construction products in the form of buildings and structures for various purposes, which in turn increases the competitiveness of enterprises. It is known that the innovations introduced into the construction industry are complex organizational and technological decisions made in the dynamics of the functioning of the enterprise and its construction activities. However, the application of innovations in the construction industry is often associated with certain risks. It is not always the funds spent on innovations pay off. Meanwhile, it is worth noting that it is impossible to achieve a stable state of an enterprise without introducing innovations. The article describes the relationship between innovations and sustainability of a construction enterprise, considers the types of innovative materials and technologies used in construction, analyzes the impact of innovations on labor productivity. The concept of sustainability is given from the point of view of the achievement of the set goals by the construction enterprise, which are determined by the chosen management strategy. Measurements of the progressiveness of the applied machinery, equipment, materials, and technologies that affect the innovative potential of the construction enterprise are described.
I.L. ABRAMOV, Candidate of Sciences (Engineering) (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)

National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (26, Yaroslavskoe Highway, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation)

1. Fedoseev I. V. Theory and methodology of effective man-agement of subjects of investment and construction complex in innovation-oriented economy (on the example of St. Petersburg). Doktor diss (Economika). Sankt-Peterburg, 2009, pp. 324. (In Russian).
2. Asaul A. N. Intensification of innovative activity in con-struction as a factor of territory development. Russian regions are the focus of change. Collection of reports of the X International conference of the Federal state educational INSTITUTION “Urfu named after the first President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin”. Ekaterinburg: UMCz UPI, 2016, pp. 834 . (In Russian).
3. Nurgalieva sh. M. Problems of evaluation of innovative potential of the enterprise. Voprosy` sovremennoj nauki i praktiki. Universitet im. V.I. Vernadskogo. 2008. Vol.1. No. 1 (11), pp: 238–244. (In Russian).
4. Chekalin G.P. Formation of a system of criteria and indicators for evaluating the effectiveness of innovative activity of small con-struction organizations. Cand. diss. (Economika). Saint Peterburg, 2005, 153 p. (In Russian).
5. Abramov I.L., Ushenin D. V. Innovations as a factor that increases the efficiency of the functioning of construction enterprises. Nauka i biznes: puti razvitiya. 2019. № 3 (93), pp. 129–133. (In Russian).
6. Gindullina E. V. Assessment of innovative potential of the construction enterprise. Molodoy ucheny. 2013. No. 11 (58), pp. 323–327. (In Russian).
7. Selyugina O.N. Innovative activity as a key factor in the development of construction organizations. Vestnik Ir GTU. 2014. No. 9 (92), pp. 229–233. (In Russian).
8. Nizamova G.M. The Essence of innovative potential. Proceedings “Economic synergetics: innovative development of Russia”. Naberezhnye Chelny. 2007, pp. 237–243: GOU VPO «KGIE`A», 2007, pp. 237–243. (In Russian).
9. Lapidus A.A. Problems of implementation of innovative solutions in the technology and organization of construction. Texnologiya i organizaciya stroitel`nogo proizvodstva. 2013. No. 4, p. 1. (In Russian)
10. Tuskaeva Z.R. Quantitative assessment of technical poten-tial of construction production. Innovacii i investicii. 2014. No. 6, pp. 142–145. (In Russian).
11. Floreza L.,J. Cortissoz Defining a mathematical function for labor productivity in masonry construction: A case study. Procedia Engineering. 2016. Vol. 164, pp. 42–48.
12. Kaverzina L.A., Semkin V. Evaluation of the innovative potential of small construction enterprises. Izvestiya Irkutskoj GE`A. 2011. No. 5, p. 9. (In Russian).
13. Shatrova A. I. Organizational and technological solutions to improve the efficiency of strategic planning of construction production. Nauka i biznes: puti razvitiya. 2018.No 12 (90), pp. 29–33. (In Russian).
14. Abramov L.I., Abramov I. L. Modeling of technological pro-cesses of construction of low-rise residential buildings. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing construction]. 2007. No. 5, pp. 2–5. (In Russian).
15. Abramov I. L., Solomatina M. . Problems of introduction of innovative technologies in construction production. Design and construction: materials of the 3rd International scientific and practical conference. Kursk, 2019, pp. 25–27. (In Russian).
16. Abramov I.L., Stepanov A., Ibrahim I. F. Advantages of pre-fabricated reinforced concrete construction in Iraq. Matec web of conferences 26. “Rsp 2017 – 26th r-s-p seminar 2017 theoretical foundation of civil engineering”. 2017, p. 00001.

For citation: Abramov I.L. Innovations in the construction industry as a factor of stable state of a construction enterprise. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2020. No. 1–2, pp. 16–20. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2020-1-2-16-20

Rational Application of House-Building Technologies

Number of journal: 1-2-2020
Autors:

Diachkova O.N.,
Tilinin Yu.I.,
Ratushin V.A.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2020-1-2-11-15
УДК: 624.05

 

AbstractAbout AuthorsReferences
Construction technologies have features that, depending on the location and tasks of construction, act as advantages or disadvantages of the architectural and construction system. The economic struggle of construction companies at the housing construction market can lead to irrational use of house-building technologies when solving urban architectural and construction problems. This was the reason for a comprehensive assessment of the rationality of the use of house-building technologies in various conditions of urban construction. The authors consider the problem is not so much from the interests of the developer and the contractor, but the city’s architectural-construction tasks and interests of consumers of construction products. When conducting the study, the task of selecting criteria for comparing house-building technologies was first solved, then the technologies of modern architectural and construction systems were evaluated according to the selected criteria. The method of expert evaluation is used for quantitative evaluation of the compared house-building technologies. According to the results of the study, a conclusion is made about the rational application field of the main house-building technologies. Monolithic house-building technology has more versatility, because it is applicable in the conditions of the historical center, especially in combination with monolithic technologies for the development of underground space, such as a wall in the ground, bored piles, and the «top-down» method. At the same time, for social housing in new territories, it is rational to use, especially in conditions of mass construction, the technology of prefabricated large-panel housing construction. In addition, the article considers the conditions for the rational use of traditional masonry and prefabricated monolithic house-building technology.
O.N. DIACHKOVA, Candidate of Sciences (Engineering),
Yu.I. TILININ, Candidate of Sciences (Engineering), (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.),
V.A. RATUSHIN,Student

Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (4, Vtoraya Krasnoarmeiskaya Street, Saint Petersburg, 190005, Russian Federation)

1. Rybnov E.I., Egorov A.N., Khaidutskii Z., Gdimiyan N.G. Organization and planning of industrial structures in large-scale housing construction. Vestnik grazhdanskikh inzhenerov. 2018. No. 3 (68), pp. 98–102. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.23968/1999-5571-2018-15-3-98-102
2. Golovina S.G., Sokol Yu.V. On the issue of research of joint work of building materials in external enclosing structures in former apartment buildings of the historical center of St. Petersburg. Vestnik grazhdanskikh inzhenerov. 2018. No. 3 (68), pp. 112–117. (In Russian).
3. Kondrat’eva L.N., Sementsov S.V., Pukharenko Yu.V. Constructive systems and materials of historical residential development of St. Petersburg of the XVIII-early XX centuries. Vestnik grazhdanskikh inzhenerov. 2016. No. 6 (59), pp. 53–58. (In Russian).
4. Yumasheva E.I. Vozrozhdenie traditsii kirpichnogo stroitel’stva trebuet ne tol’ko vysokokachestvennykh materialov, no i podgotovki vysokokvalifitsirovannykh kadrov. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2014. No. 1–2, pp. 42–45. (In Russian).
5. Yudina A.F., D’yachkova O.N. Analysis of options for design and construction solutions for residential multi-storey buildings (on the example of St. Petersburg). Vestnik grazhdanskikh inzhenerov. 2010. No. 2 (23), pp. 115–122. (In Russian).
6. Tilinin Yu.I., Kazanbaeva V.S., Tarshilova T.A. Development and improvement of construction cranes. Kollokvium-zhurnal. 2019. No. 1–5 (25). Vol. 1 (Varshava, Pol’sha), pp. 32–33.
7. Avdeeva A.O., Tilinin Yu.I. Choosing the rational number of private construction flows of the production program of the finishing enterprise. Kollokvium-zhurnal. 2018. No. 11 (22). Vol. 6 (Varshava, Pol’sha), pp. 4–6.
8. Yumasheva E.I., Sapacheva L.V. Krupnopanel’noe domostroenie ostaetsya samym bystrym i ekonomichnym. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2014. No. 10, pp. 3–10. (In Russian).
9. Kireeva E.I. Large-Panel buildings with loop connections of structures. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2013. No. 9, pp. 47–50. (In Russian).
10. Evtyukov S.A., Tilinin Yu.I., Shcherbakov A.P. On the issue of automation of monolithic housing construction processes taking into account the study of structural steels in construction robotics. Vestnik grazhdanskikh inzhenerov. 2019. No.  3 (74), рр. 72–79. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.23968/1999-5571-2019-16-3-72-79
11. Tilinin Yu.I., Yudina A.F. Influence of drainage system technology on the consolidation of alluvial sand massif. Vestnik grazhdanskikh inzhenerov. 2018. No. 6 (71), рр. 62–67. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.23968/1999-5571-2018-15-6-62-67
12. Gaido A.N., Verstov V.V. On the issue of determining the technological parameters of the production of pile works in cramped conditions. Vestnik grazhdanskikh inzhenerov. 2017. No. 3 (62), рр. 84–94. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.23968/1999-5571-2017-14-3-84-94
13. Gaido A.N. Ways to improve technological solutions for the construction of pile foundations of residential buildings in the conditions of urban development. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2015. No. 9, рр. 12–15. (In Russian).
14. Plotnikov V.V., Kopacheva M.V. Improvement of joints of structures and installation equipment in the system of a ringless frame in order to accelerate its construction. Stroitel’stvo i rekonstruktsiya. 2014. No. 2 (52), pp. 27–35. (In Russian).

For citation: Diachkova O.N., Tilinin Yu.I., Ratushin V.A. Rational application of house-building technologies. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2020. No. 1–2, pp. 11–15. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2020-1-2-11-15

Influence of the Discrete Nature of Non-Stackable Resources on the Adjustment of the Construction Projects Implementation Schedule

Number of journal: 1-2-2020
Autors:

Dobrosotskikh M.G.,
Makarychev K.V.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2020-1-2-3-10
УДК: 624

 

AbstractAbout AuthorsReferences
The analysis of existing methods of calendar planning of construction production is carried out. It is determined that in practice, the optimal implementation of the project is complicated by external stochastic influences, which necessitates dynamic adjustment of the project implementation process. It is shown that only when the discrete nature of resources consumed has a weak influence on the pace of work on the project, the parameters of the catch-up schedule are determined by the dynamics of the time-averaged volumes, rates, and accelerations of work. In the opposite limit, speeds and accelerations of work experience a jump at the moment of changing the number of used resources. In this case, the speed of work is determined by the usage profile of the dominant discrete non-stackable resources. The dynamics of work volumes, in contrast to their speeds, demonstrates a weak sensitivity, both to the discrete nature of resources and to external stochastic influences, and can not serve as a basis for dynamic adjustment of the schedule. It is shown that time averaging leads to loss of information about these features of construction dynamics. An algorithm for forming a catch-up work schedule is obtained based on the results of monitoring the work rate and averaging only the number of discrete resources over periods of constant composition. Both an empirical method for separating stochastic and deterministic effects on the course of project implementation, and a method based on the qualitative difference between the Fourier spectra of stochastic and deterministic functions have been developed. The limits of applicability of empirical and exact methods are analyzed. It is shown that the Fourier analysis of the monitoring results makes it possible to completely restore the deterministic information even against the background of a stochastic signal that coincides with it in intensity. It is shown that the proposed algorithm makes it possible to formulate the parameters of the catch-up work schedule, which allows avoiding financial and image losses associated with the untimely completion of the project or its main parts.
M.G. DOBROSOTSKIKH, Magister (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.),
K.V. MAKARYCHEV, Magister

Voronezh State Technical University (84, 20 let Oktyabrya Street, Voronezh, 394006, Russian Federation)

1. Dikman L.G. Organizatsiya stroitel’nogo proizvodstva [Organization of construction production]. Moscow: ASV, 2006. 607 p.
2. Levy Sidney M. Project management in construction. New York – Chicago – San Francisco: McGraw-Hill, 2007. 409 p.
3. Vasil’ev V.M. Upravlenie v stroitel’stve [Construction management]. Moscow: ASV, 2001. 477 с.
4. Kievskii L.V. Kompleksnost’ i potok [Complexity and flow]. Moscow: Stroyizdat, 1987. 419 с.
5. Afanas’ev A.V. Non-rhythmic flows with continuous peer-to-peer operations. Sovershenstvovanie organizatsii i upravleniya stroitel’stvom. Leningrad: LISI. 1982, pp. 13–22.
6. Gusakov A.A. Organizatsionno-tekhnologicheskaya nadezhnost’ stroitel’stva [Organizational and technological reliability of construction]. Moscow: SVR-Argus, 1994.
7. Larichev O., Sternin M. Knowledge-based approach for solving the multicriteria assignment problem. Linster M. (Ed.). Sisyphus 92. Models of problem solving. Arbeitspapiere der GMD 630. March 1992.
8. Krüger, Wilfried (2006): Excellence in Change – Wege zur strategischen Erneuerung, 3.Auflage, Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag, pp. 212–213.
9. Project Management Institute (2013). A Guide to the Project Man agement Body of Knowledge (5th ed.). Project Management Institute.
10. MacCrimmon K.R., Ryavec C.A. An Analytical Study of the PERT Assumtion, Opt. Res. V. 12, No. 1, 1964, pp. 16–38.
11. Dikman L.G., Dikman D.L., Organizatsiya stroitel’stva v SShA [Organization of construction in USA]. Moscow: ASV, 2004, 608 p.
12. Larichev O.I., Pavlova L.I., Osipova E.A. Multi-criteria problems with constructed solutions with limited resources. Problemy i metody prinyatiya unikal’nykh i povtoryayushchikhsya reshenii. Moscow: VNIISI, 1990. No. 10, pp. 66–74.
13. Us’kov V.V. Komp’yuternye tekhnologii v podgotovke i upravlenii stroitel’stvom ob”ektov [Computer technology in the preparation and management of construction projects]. Vologda: Infra-Inzheneriya, 2011. 320 s.
14. Mishchenko V.Ya., Dobrosotskikh M.G., Elena El Ersburn. Optimization of the Construction Operation Scheduling Through Redeployment of Nonstockable Resources. Nedvizhimost’: Ekonomika i upravlenie. 2019. No. 1, рр. 83–87. (In Russian).
15. Mishchenko V.Ya., Dobrosotskikh M.G. NP solvable task of scheduling of construction, reconstruction and repair of objects. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Tekhnologiya tekstil’noi promyshlennosti. 2016. No. 6 (366), рр. 13–20. (In Russian).
16. Smith L.P. Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers. NewYork, Prentice Hall Inc. Englewood Cliff. 2003. 477 p.
17. Anders V. Fourier Analysis and Its Applications. Series: Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Vol. 223. 2003 Springer-Verlag, New York, Inc. (2003), 272 p.
18. Schoenberg I.J., Some Analytical Aspects of the Problem of Smoothing. Courant Anniversary Volute. Interscience Publishers. New York, 1998.
19. Preobrazhenskii M., Rudakov O., Popova M., Tran Hai Dang. Isolation of determined component of empirical dependences of physicochemical properties of binary solutions on the composition. Journal of Science and Technology, Natural science – engineering – technology. 2017, Vol. 169, No. 09, pp. 89–92.
20. Pierre Brémaud. Fourier Analysis and Stochastic Processes. Springer International Publishing AG. 2014. 385 р.

For citation: Dobrosotskikh M.G., Makarychev K.V. Influence of the discrete nature of non-stackable resources on the adjustment of the construction projects implementation schedule. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2020. No. 1–2, pp. 3–10. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2020-1-2-3-10

https://www.traditionrolex.com/11