AbstractAbout AuthorsReferences
The construction of facilities in cluttered urban conditions requires a special approach related to the need to develop and implement measures to ensure accident-free operation of buildings of the surrounding development within the geotechnical influence limits. Often, builders neglect the influence of the technology of construction of a new object on possible negative defects (cracks appeared on the facades due to uneven settlements, tilts, etc.) of the buildings being operated. Until now, the concept of «minimum price» is exaggerated when building the part of the building below the zero mark, ignoring the technical feasibility. At the same time, builders go to any tricks to reduce the cost. Such «irrational» method of construction ultimately could lead to a significant cost increase in construction of the zero part of the building and, as a rule, to an increase in the period of construction (approval of the new project as a result of replacement with another geotechnical technology, passing the new construction expertise). A negative case from the geotechnical practice of construction of a 16-storey residential building next to the existing five-storey residential building is considered.
N.S. SOKOLOV, Candidate of Sciences (Engineering) (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)
I.N. Ulianov Chuvash State University (15, Moskovskiy pr., Cheboksary, 428015, Russian Federation)
1. Mangushev R.A., Nikiforova N.S., Konyushkov V.V., Osokin A.I. Proektirovanie i ustrojstvo podzemnyh sooruzhenij v otkrytyh kotlovanah [Design and construction of underground structures in open pits]. Moscow: ASV, 2013. 256 p.
2. Mangushev R.A., Veselov A.A., Konyushkov V.V., Sapin D.A. Numerical modeling of technological precipitation of neighboring buildings in the device trench “wall in the ground”. Vestnik grazhdanskih inzhenerov. 2012. No. 5 (34), pp. 87–98. (In Russian).
3. Makovetsky O.A., Zuev S.S., Khusainov I.I., Timofeev M.A. Ensuring geotechnical safety of the building under construction. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2014. No. 9, pp. 34–38. (In Russian).
4. Ilichev V.A., Konovalov P.A., Nikiforova N.S., Bulgakov L.A. Deformations of the Retaining Structures Upon Deep Excavations in Moscow. Proc. Of Fifth Int. Conf on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering, April 3–17, New York, 2004, pp. 5–24.
5. Ilyichev V.A., Nikiforova N.S., Koreneva E.B. Computing the evaluation of deformations of the buildings located near deep foundation tranches. Proc. of the XVIth European conf. on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering. Madrid, Spain, 24–27th September 2007 «Geo-technical Engineering in urban Environments». Vol. 2, рр. 581–585.
6. Nikiforova N.S., Vnukov D.A. Geotechnical cut-off diaphragms for built-up area protection in urban underground development. Proc. of the 7thI nt. Symp. “Geotechnical aspects of underground construction in soft ground». 16-18 May, 2011, tc28 IS Roma, AGI, 2011, No. 157 NIK.
7. Nikiforova N.S., Vnukov D.A. The use of cut off of different types as a protection measure for existing buildings at the nearby underground pipelines installation. Proc. of Int. Geotech. Conf. dedicated to the Year of Russia in Kazakhstan. Almaty, Kazakhstan, 23–25 September 2004, pp. 338–342.
8. Petrukhin V.P., Shuljatjev O.A., Mozgacheva O.A. Effect of geotechnical work on settlement of surrounding buildings at underground construction. Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. Prague, 2003.
9. Triantafyllidis Th., Schafer R. Impact of diaphragm wall construction on the stress state in soft ground and serviceability of adjacent foundations. Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Madrid, Spain. September, 22–27. 2007, рр. 683–688.
10. Ponomarev A.B. Geotechnical monitoring of a house. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2015. No. 9, pp. 41–46. (In Russian).
11. Sokolov N.S., Viktorova S.S., Fedorova T.G. Piles of increased bearing capacity. Materials of the 8th all-Russian (2nd International) conference “New in architecture, design of building structures and reconstruction” (NASKR-2014). 2014. Cheboksary: CSU, pp. 411–415. (In Russian).
12. Sokolov N.S. With., Rabinow V.M. Technology of the piles increased the bearing capacity. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2016. No. 9, pp. 11–14. (In Russian).
13. Sokolov N.S. With. Technological methods devices bored piles with multiple caps. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2016. No. 10, pp. 54–59. (In Russian).
2. Mangushev R.A., Veselov A.A., Konyushkov V.V., Sapin D.A. Numerical modeling of technological precipitation of neighboring buildings in the device trench “wall in the ground”. Vestnik grazhdanskih inzhenerov. 2012. No. 5 (34), pp. 87–98. (In Russian).
3. Makovetsky O.A., Zuev S.S., Khusainov I.I., Timofeev M.A. Ensuring geotechnical safety of the building under construction. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2014. No. 9, pp. 34–38. (In Russian).
4. Ilichev V.A., Konovalov P.A., Nikiforova N.S., Bulgakov L.A. Deformations of the Retaining Structures Upon Deep Excavations in Moscow. Proc. Of Fifth Int. Conf on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering, April 3–17, New York, 2004, pp. 5–24.
5. Ilyichev V.A., Nikiforova N.S., Koreneva E.B. Computing the evaluation of deformations of the buildings located near deep foundation tranches. Proc. of the XVIth European conf. on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering. Madrid, Spain, 24–27th September 2007 «Geo-technical Engineering in urban Environments». Vol. 2, рр. 581–585.
6. Nikiforova N.S., Vnukov D.A. Geotechnical cut-off diaphragms for built-up area protection in urban underground development. Proc. of the 7thI nt. Symp. “Geotechnical aspects of underground construction in soft ground». 16-18 May, 2011, tc28 IS Roma, AGI, 2011, No. 157 NIK.
7. Nikiforova N.S., Vnukov D.A. The use of cut off of different types as a protection measure for existing buildings at the nearby underground pipelines installation. Proc. of Int. Geotech. Conf. dedicated to the Year of Russia in Kazakhstan. Almaty, Kazakhstan, 23–25 September 2004, pp. 338–342.
8. Petrukhin V.P., Shuljatjev O.A., Mozgacheva O.A. Effect of geotechnical work on settlement of surrounding buildings at underground construction. Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. Prague, 2003.
9. Triantafyllidis Th., Schafer R. Impact of diaphragm wall construction on the stress state in soft ground and serviceability of adjacent foundations. Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Madrid, Spain. September, 22–27. 2007, рр. 683–688.
10. Ponomarev A.B. Geotechnical monitoring of a house. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2015. No. 9, pp. 41–46. (In Russian).
11. Sokolov N.S., Viktorova S.S., Fedorova T.G. Piles of increased bearing capacity. Materials of the 8th all-Russian (2nd International) conference “New in architecture, design of building structures and reconstruction” (NASKR-2014). 2014. Cheboksary: CSU, pp. 411–415. (In Russian).
12. Sokolov N.S. With., Rabinow V.M. Technology of the piles increased the bearing capacity. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2016. No. 9, pp. 11–14. (In Russian).
13. Sokolov N.S. With. Technological methods devices bored piles with multiple caps. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2016. No. 10, pp. 54–59. (In Russian).
For citation: Sokolov N.S. One of the common mistakes when building objects in cluttered urban environment. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2020. No. 1–2, pp. 25–30. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2020-1-2-25-30