Rational Application of House-Building Technologies

Construction technologies have features that, depending on the location and tasks of construction, act as advantages or disadvantages of the architectural and construction system. The economic struggle of construction companies at the housing construction market can lead to irrational use of house-building technologies when solving urban architectural and construction problems. This was the reason for a comprehensive assessment of the rationality of the use of house-building technologies in various conditions of urban construction. The authors consider the problem is not so much from the interests of the developer and the contractor, but the city’s architectural-construction tasks and interests of consumers of construction products. When conducting the study, the task of selecting criteria for comparing house-building technologies was first solved, then the technologies of modern architectural and construction systems were evaluated according to the selected criteria. The method of expert evaluation is used for quantitative evaluation of the compared house-building technologies. According to the results of the study, a conclusion is made about the rational application field of the main house-building technologies. Monolithic house-building technology has more versatility, because it is applicable in the conditions of the historical center, especially in combination with monolithic technologies for the development of underground space, such as a wall in the ground, bored piles, and the «top-down» method. At the same time, for social housing in new territories, it is rational to use, especially in conditions of mass construction, the technology of prefabricated large-panel housing construction. In addition, the article considers the conditions for the rational use of traditional masonry and prefabricated monolithic house-building technology.

O.N. DIACHKOVA, Candidate of Sciences (Engineering),
Yu.I. TILININ, Candidate of Sciences (Engineering), (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.),
V.A. RATUSHIN,Student

Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (4, Vtoraya Krasnoarmeiskaya Street, Saint Petersburg, 190005, Russian Federation)

1. Rybnov E.I., Egorov A.N., Khaidutskii Z., Gdimiyan N.G. Organization and planning of industrial structures in large-scale housing construction. Vestnik grazhdanskikh inzhenerov. 2018. No. 3 (68), pp. 98–102. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.23968/1999-5571-2018-15-3-98-102
2. Golovina S.G., Sokol Yu.V. On the issue of research of joint work of building materials in external enclosing structures in former apartment buildings of the historical center of St. Petersburg. Vestnik grazhdanskikh inzhenerov. 2018. No. 3 (68), pp. 112–117. (In Russian).
3. Kondrat’eva L.N., Sementsov S.V., Pukharenko Yu.V. Constructive systems and materials of historical residential development of St. Petersburg of the XVIII-early XX centuries. Vestnik grazhdanskikh inzhenerov. 2016. No. 6 (59), pp. 53–58. (In Russian).
4. Yumasheva E.I. Vozrozhdenie traditsii kirpichnogo stroitel’stva trebuet ne tol’ko vysokokachestvennykh materialov, no i podgotovki vysokokvalifitsirovannykh kadrov. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2014. No. 1–2, pp. 42–45. (In Russian).
5. Yudina A.F., D’yachkova O.N. Analysis of options for design and construction solutions for residential multi-storey buildings (on the example of St. Petersburg). Vestnik grazhdanskikh inzhenerov. 2010. No. 2 (23), pp. 115–122. (In Russian).
6. Tilinin Yu.I., Kazanbaeva V.S., Tarshilova T.A. Development and improvement of construction cranes. Kollokvium-zhurnal. 2019. No. 1–5 (25). Vol. 1 (Varshava, Pol’sha), pp. 32–33.
7. Avdeeva A.O., Tilinin Yu.I. Choosing the rational number of private construction flows of the production program of the finishing enterprise. Kollokvium-zhurnal. 2018. No. 11 (22). Vol. 6 (Varshava, Pol’sha), pp. 4–6.
8. Yumasheva E.I., Sapacheva L.V. Krupnopanel’noe domostroenie ostaetsya samym bystrym i ekonomichnym. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2014. No. 10, pp. 3–10. (In Russian).
9. Kireeva E.I. Large-Panel buildings with loop connections of structures. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2013. No. 9, pp. 47–50. (In Russian).
10. Evtyukov S.A., Tilinin Yu.I., Shcherbakov A.P. On the issue of automation of monolithic housing construction processes taking into account the study of structural steels in construction robotics. Vestnik grazhdanskikh inzhenerov. 2019. No.  3 (74), рр. 72–79. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.23968/1999-5571-2019-16-3-72-79
11. Tilinin Yu.I., Yudina A.F. Influence of drainage system technology on the consolidation of alluvial sand massif. Vestnik grazhdanskikh inzhenerov. 2018. No. 6 (71), рр. 62–67. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.23968/1999-5571-2018-15-6-62-67
12. Gaido A.N., Verstov V.V. On the issue of determining the technological parameters of the production of pile works in cramped conditions. Vestnik grazhdanskikh inzhenerov. 2017. No. 3 (62), рр. 84–94. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.23968/1999-5571-2017-14-3-84-94
13. Gaido A.N. Ways to improve technological solutions for the construction of pile foundations of residential buildings in the conditions of urban development. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2015. No. 9, рр. 12–15. (In Russian).
14. Plotnikov V.V., Kopacheva M.V. Improvement of joints of structures and installation equipment in the system of a ringless frame in order to accelerate its construction. Stroitel’stvo i rekonstruktsiya. 2014. No. 2 (52), pp. 27–35. (In Russian).