National Urbanized Regions are Promising Objects of Spatial Strategizing and Planning in the Russian Federation

The modern approach to the definition of urbanized regions as innovative forms of space organization at the macro-regional level is considered. The concept of urban regional town planning presented in the article identifies two main types of urbanized regions: «supranational» and «national». The importance of targeted urban planning and management of national urban regions is emphasized in order to increase the effectiveness of territorial management, strengthen national security and economic sustainability of the country. Promising objects of urba-regional strategizing and planning in Russia are outlined.

M.E. MONASTYRSKAYA, Candidate of Architecture, Docent (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.),
O.A. PESLYAK, Candidate of Architecture, (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)

Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (4, 2nd Krasnoarmeiskaya Street, 190005, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation)

1. Моисеев Ю.М. Влияние глобализации на эволюцию культуры градостроительного планирования // Вестник МАН РС. 2010. № 2. С. 30–36.
1. Moiseev Yu.M. The impact of globalization on the evolution of urban planning culture. Vestnik MAN RS. 2010. No. 2, pp. 30–36. (In Russian).
2. Швец И.Ю. Пространственно-временные закономерности агломерационного развития // Экономика строительства и природопользования. 2020. № 4 (77). С. 107–115.
2. Shvets I.Yu. Spatial and temporal patterns of agglomeration development. Ekonomika stroitel’stva i prirodopol’zovaniya. 2020. No. 4 (77), pp. 107–115. (In Russian).
3. Монастырская М.Е. «Урборегиональное строительство» как потенциальный вектор достижения стратегической цели пространственного развития Российской Федерации // Градостроительство и архитектура. 2022. Т. 12. № 1 (46). С. 41–52.
3. Monastyrskaya M.E., Peslyak O.A. “Urbanregional development” as a potential vector for achieving the strategic goal of spatial development Of the Russian Federation. Gradostroitelstvo i arhitectura. 2022. Vol. 12. No. 1 (46), pp. 41–52. (In Russian).
4. Монастырская М.Е., Песляк О.А. Урбанизированные регионы Балтики как актуальные и перспективные объекты стратегического планирования // Архитектура и современные информационные технологии. 2020. № 4 (53). С. 249–265.
4. Monastyrskaya M.E., Peslyak O.A. Urbanized regions of the Baltic Sea as relevant and promising objects of strategic planning. Arkhitektura i sovremennye informatsionnye tekhnologii. 2020. No. 4 (53), pp. 249–265. (In Russian).
5. Vinci I. Governing the metropolitan dimension: a critical perspective on institutional reshaping and planning innovation in Italy. European Journal of Spatial Development. 2019. No. 70, pp. 1–21. DOI: http://doi.org/10.30689/EJSD2018:70.1650-9544
6. Zenker S., Jacobsen В. Inter-regional place branding: best practices, challenges and solutions. Springer. 2015. 184 p.
7. Hønneland G. Identity Formation in the Barents Euro-Arctic region. Cooperation and Conflict. 1998. No. 33, pp. 277–297.
8. Xu J. Mega-city region governance and planning: diverse processes and reconstituted state spaces. Mega-City Region Governance and Planning: An International Comparative Perspective. Chapter 1. Routledge. 2011. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274065885_Mega-city_region_governance_and_planning_diverse_processes_and_reconstituted_state_spaces/references (дата обращения: 10.10.2023).
9. Gorshenina M.N., Borovikova D. Karelin Far Eastern Region: Sustainable Development or a Large City (Case Study of Chita). Architecture and Engeneering. 2022. Vol. 7. No. 3, pp. 27–36.
10. Gualini E. The rescaling of governance in Europe: new spatial and institutional rationales. European Planning Studies. 2006. No. 14 (7), pp. 881–904. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310500496255
11. Песляк О.А. Предпосылки совершенствования системы градостроительного планирования в Санкт-Петербурге // Вестник гражданских инженеров. 2016. № 4 (57). С. 38–44.
11. Peslyak O.A. Prerequisites for improving the urban planning system in St. Petersburg. Vestnik grazhdanskikh inzhenerov. 2016. No. 4 (57), pp. 38–44. (In Russian).
12. Митягин С.Д. Градостроительство. Эпоха перемен. Агломерация как объект управления. СПб.: Зодчий, 2016. 221 c.
12. Mityagin S.D. Gradostroitel’stvo. Epokha peremen. Aglomeratsiya kak ob”ekt upravleniya radio construction [The era of change Agglomeration as an object of management]. Saint Petersburg: Zodchii. 2016. 221 p. (In Russian).
13. Михеева Н.Н. Стратегия пространственного развития: новый этап или повторение старых ошибок? // ЭКО. 2018. № 5. С. 158–178.
13. Mikheeva N.N. Strategy of spatial development: a new stage or repetition of old mistakes? EKO. 2018. No. 5, pp. 158–178. (In Russian).