Determination of Architectural and Technical Height as a Sign of Uniqueness of Buildings

The article provides the substantiation of the method for determining the architectural and technical height of buildings as a sign of uniqueness, taking into account the features of the relief and the layout of the underground part of the building. The analysis of legal acts and regulatory and technical documentation for the identification of buildings and structures on the grounds of uniqueness has been carried out. It is known that the Urban Planning Code (GC) of the Russian Federation determines the conditions for classifying buildings and structures as unique in the following parameters: height, span, presence of a console, deepening of the underground part. At the same time, the GC does not contain definitions and methods for measuring these parameters. As a result, the signs of uniqueness according to the specified parameters are determined by codes of practice (RV), where the definitions of the term “height” of a construction object have significant differences in meaning and measurement methods, including. and within one joint venture. The most significant contradictions arise when identifying multi-level buildings of terraced type, since building codes were drawn up without taking into account the architectural typology of terraced construction. Misinterpretation of methods for determining the height of buildings can lead to a situation where any one-story multi-level object of great length, built on a slope, can formally be identified as unique, although obviously it is not. In order to avoid errors in identifying buildings for uniqueness, the calculation of the building height should be performed taking into account the level-by-level layout of the building parts, due to its integration into the existing slope and the peculiarities of the perception and transfer of loads from the building structures to the base.

S.V. VAVRENYUK¹, Doctor of Sciences (Engineering) (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.),
A.E. FARAFONOV¹, Engineer (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.);
N.Y. TSIMBELMAN², Candidate of Sciences (Engineering) (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.),
V.G. VAVRENYUK², Candidate of Sciences (Engineering) (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)

¹ Branch of FGBU «TsNIIP Ministry of Construction of Russia» Far Eastern Research, Design and Technological Institute for Construction (Branch of FGBU TsNIIP Ministry of Construction of Russia DalNIIS) (14, Borodinskaya St., Vladivostok, 690033, Russian Federation)
² Far Eastern Federal University (FEFU) (10, Ajax, Russky Fr., Vladivostok, 690922, Russian Federation)

1. Belostotsky A.M., Akimov P.A., Dmitriev D.S., Nagibovich A.I., Petryashev N.O., Petryashev S.O. Computational study of mechanical safety parameters of the high-rise (404 meters) residential complex “One Tower” in the business center “Moscow City”. Academia. Stroitel’stvo i arkhitektura. 2019. No. 3, pp. 122–129. (In Russian).
2. Guryev V.V., Dorofeev V.M. Structural safety of load-bearing structures of high-rise and wide-span structures. Materials of the IV International Conference – exhibition “Unique and special technologies in construction”. UST-Build 2007. Moscow. 2007, pp. 50–52. (In Russian).
3. Travush B.I., Shakhramanyan A.M., Kolotovichev Yu.A., Shakhvorostov A.I., Desyatkin M.A., Shulyatyev O.A., Shulyatyev C.O. “Lakhta Center”: automated monitoring of deformations of load-bearing structures and bases. Academia. Stroitel’stvo i arkhitektura. 2018. No. 4, pp. 94–108. (In Russian).
4. Lapidus A.A., Kangezova M.H. Systematization of organizational and technological aspects of scientific and technical support of buildings and structures with a height of more than 100 m. Proceedings of the First joint scientific and practical conference of GBU “CEIIS” and IPRIM RAS. Moscow. 2019, pp. 204–209. (In Russian).
5. Lapidus A.A., Shisterova A.V. Analysis of current regulatory documents in terms of scientific and technical support for the design of buildings and structures with an increased level of responsibility. Sistemnye tekhnologii. 2019. No. 30, pp. 5–9. (In Russian).
6. Nikonov N.M. Once again about the features of the design and construction of unique structures. Arkhitektura i stroitel’stvo Moskvy. 2007. No. 1, pp. 35–40. (In Russian).
7. Sinenko S.A., Emmin E., Grabovy P.G., Vilman Yu.A., Grabovy K.P. The experience of using new technologies in the construction of modern buildings and structures (on the example of the Moscow-City MMDC complex). Vestnik MGSU. 2012. No. 4, pp. 165–169. (In Russian).
8. Kabanov V.A., Zmytsky O.N. The level of responsibility and reliability of structural systems. Stroitel’naya mekhanika inzhenernykh konstruktsii i sooruzhenii. 2008. No. 4, pp. 66–71. (In Russian).
9. Ivashenko Yu. A. Ensuring reliability in the design of buildings and structures using reinforced concrete. Akademicheskii vestnik UralNIIproekt RAASN. 2012. No. 1, pp. 92–94. (In Russian).
10. Ganeev R.R. Legal regulation of construction activity. Aktual’nye problemy ekonomiki i prava. 2011. No. 2, pp. 172–175. (In Russian).
11. Topchy D.V., Chernigov V.S. Features of construction control at unique construction sites. Sovremennye naukoemkie tekhnologi. 2019. No. 10–2, pp. 331–336. (In Russian).
12. Rogonsky V.A., Kostrits A.I., Sheryakov V.F. Ekspluatatsionnaya nadezhnost’ zdanii i sooruzhenii [Operational reliability of buildings and structures]. Saint Petersburg: Stroyizdat. 2004. 272 p.
13. Mangushev R.A., Nikitina N.S., Gorodnova E.V. Numerical justification of the project of works for the construction of a multi-storey building on a slope. Vestnik MGSU. 2012. No. 5, pp. 62–66. (In Russian).
14. Eremeev P.G. Design features of unique large-span buildings and structures. Stroitel’naya mekhanika inzhenernykh konstruktsii i sooruzhenii. 2005. No. 1, pp. 69–75. (In Russian).
15. Eremeev P.G. Prevention of avalanche-like (progressive) collapse of bearing structures of unique large-span buildings and structures during emergency impacts. Stroitel’naya mekhanika inzhenernykh konstruktsii i sooruzhenii. 2006. No. 2, pp. 65–72. (In Russian).
16. Sussman T., Bathe K.J. 3D-shell elements for structures in large strains. Computers & Structures. 2013. Vol. 122, pp. 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.12.018
17. Belostotsky A.M. Mathematical models in the basis and composition of monitoring systems of load-bearing structures of high-rise buildings. From profanity to implementation. Vysotnye zdaniya. 2014. No. 4, pp. 102–107. (In Russian).
18. Belostotsky A.M., Akimov P.A., Petryashev N.O., Petryashev S.O., Negrozov O.A. Computational studies of the stress-strain state, strength and stability of load-bearing structures of a high-rise building taking into account the actual position of reinforced concrete structures. Vestnik MGSU. 2015. No. 4, pp. 50–68. (In Russian).