Adaptation of Cultural Heritage Objects for Modern Use: Organization of Design

Number of journal: 8-2021
Autors:

Kolchedantsev L.M.,
Chakhkiev I.M.,
Magamadov H.A.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2021-8-37-43
УДК: 728.03

 

AbstractAbout AuthorsReferences
The problems related to the organization of the design of cultural heritage objects for adaptation for modern use are considered; the philosophical approach of foreign and domestic specialists to the preservation of cultural heritage objects is reflected; the types of works related to the preservation of cultural heritage objects in accordance with Federal Law No. 73-FZ of 25.06.2002 “On Cultural Heritage Objects (Historical and Cultural Monuments) of the Peoples of the Russian Federation” (as amended on 19.12.2016 No. 431-FZ) are given. The essence of possible types of work on cultural heritage objects is described; the relevance of the works is determined; a number of problems and primary reasons faced by design organizations when designing the adaptation of cultural heritage objects for modern use are reflected. On the example of the reconstruction of the Mikhailovsky Palace in St. Petersburg, the experience of organizing the design of a cultural heritage object for modern use is given; the problems that the project organization faced when designing the object under study are listed; the main design solutions of the object under study are reflected; graphic material is presented.
L.M. KOLCHEDANTSEV, Doctor of Sciences (Engineering),
I.M. CHAKHKIEV, Candidate of Sciences (Engineering),
H.A. MAGAMADOV, Bachelor, Master Candidate

Saint-Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (4, Vtoraya Krasnoarmeiskaya Street, 190005, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation)

1. Mikhailova N.N. Modern values of cultural heritage and new approaches to its preservation. Tradicionnoe prikladnoe iskusstvo i obrazovanie. 2020. No. 1 (33), pp. 130–138. (In Russian).
2. Dutton D. Artistic Instinct: Beauty, Pleasure and Human Evolution. Oxford University Press. 2009. 278 p.
3. Landry С. The Origins & Futures of the Creative City. Creative City. Gloucestershire: Comedia, 2012.
4. Paliy K.R. Regulatory and legal mechanism for the development and implementation of a policy for the preservation of objects of historical and cultural heritage of St. Petersburg. Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie. 2018. No. 7 (115), pp. 146–150. (In Russian).
5. Khakimov D.R., Trebukhin A.F. Features of the conservation and adaptation of cultural heritage to modern conditions. Vestnik Evrazijskoj nauki. 2019. No. 1. Vol. 11, рр. 57. (In Russian).
6. Magamadov Kh. A. Factors influencing the directive terms of designing objects of cultural heritage. Collection of articles of undergraduates and postgraduates. St. Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering. 2020. Iss. 3, pp. 264–270. (In Russian).
7. Grimm G.G. The works of Karl Rossi on the Mikhailovsky Palace, square and street. Arhitektura i stroitel’stvo Leningrada. 1936. No. 2, pp. 44–51. (In Russian).
8. Polovtsov A.V. A walk through the Russian Museum of Emperor Alexander III in St. Petersburg. Moscow: Tipografiya T-va Kushnereva. 1900. 173 p.
9. Fedotova N.Yu. Types of modernization of museum complexes of the late XX-early XXI century. Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal eksperimental’nogo obrazovaniya. 2015. No. 7, pp. 75–79. (In Russian).
10. Sakhnovsky V.A., Polovtsev I.N. Adaptation of courtyards with museum and technological modernization of the Mikhailovsky Palace of the Russian Museum. Vestnik. Zodchij. 21 vek. 2016. No. 2–2 (59), pp. 46–48. (In Russian).

For citation: Kolchedantsev L.M., Chakhkiev I.M., Magamadov H.A. Adaptation of cultural heritage objects for modern use: organization of design. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2021. No. 8, pp. 37–43. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2021-8-37-43


Print   Email