Methodology for Identifying Territories Within the Boundaries of Which it is Advisable to Place New Objects of Preschool and General Education

Number of journal: 12-2020
Autors:

Dolgushin A.V.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2020-12-29-35
УДК: 727.112

 

AbstractAbout AuthorsReferences
The main factors determining the need to place educational facilities on the territory of municipalities and districts of Moscow are highlighted. The method of selecting territories within the boundaries of which the location of objects of preschool and general education is the most relevant is proposed. It was used to develop sound proposals for ensuring the balancing development of educational and housing stock facilities. In order to select priority territories within the boundaries of which it is advisable to place new objects of preschool and general education, specialists of the NPTS «City Development» determined the current and projected capacity deficit in objects of preschool and general education. The calculation was carried out in the context of individual buildings that provide services in the field of preschool and general education, residential blocks and micro-districts, as well as municipal formations. It was established that it is advisable to locate new pre-school education facilities within the boundaries of blocks where the projected capacity deficit exceeds 120 places, and to place new general education facilities within the boundaries of blocks where the projected capacity deficit exceeds 550 places.
A.V. DOLGUSHIN, Candidate of Sciences (Economy) (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)

OOO NPTS «City Development» (structure 3, 19, Mira Avenue, 129090, Moscow, Russian Federation)

1. Tolstykh E.S. Complex indicator of the comfort of the living environment. Ekonomika i predprinimatel’stvo. 2018. No. 7 (96), pp. 515–518. (In Russian).
2. Lyovkin S.I., Kievsky L.V. Urban planning aspects of sectoral state programs. Promyshlennoye i grazhdanskoye stroitel’stvo. 2012. No. 6, pp. 26–32. (In Russian).
3. Bolsherotova L.V., Bolsherotov A.L. Renovation in Moscow: problems and solutions. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2018. No. 3, pp. 9–14. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2018-4-9-14
4. Nikolaev S.V. Renovation of housing stock of the country on the basis of large-panel housing construction. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2018. No. 3, pp. 3–7. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2018-3-3-7
5. Goncharov Y.A., Dubrovina G.G. Achievement of ergonomics in architecture due to the use of façade décor on the basis of mineral wool. Stroitel’nye Materialy [Construction Materials]. 2019. No. 3, pp. 14–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0585-430X-2019-768-3-14-18 (In Russian).
6. Mogzoev A.M., Kuzmicheva K.I. Renovation of the housing stock of the city of Moscow. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta im. S.Yu. Vitte. Seriya 1: Ekonomika i upravleniye. 2017. No. 4 (23), pp. 70–74. (In Russian).
7. Toporkova M.K., Smorodinova L.Yu. Implementation of the program for the renovation of the housing stock in the city of Moscow. Rossiyskoye gosudarstvovedeniye. 2018. No. 1, pp. 69–82. (In Russian).
8. Hakobyan G.L., Kas’yanov V.F., Kolobova S.V. Renovation of residential buildings in the city of Moscow. In the collection: Integration, partnership and innovation in building science and education. Collection of materials of the VI International Scientific Conference. 2018, pp. 86–92. (In Russian).
9. Kirsanov A.R. Construction of kindergartens and schools: legislation and practice. Imushchestvennyye otnosheniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2015. No. 6 (165), pp. 20–24. (In Russian).
10. Kuznetsov A.N., Skobeltsina K.N. On the issue of providing the regions of the Russian Federation with educational infrastructure: analysis of statistical information. Munitsipal’noye obrazovaniye: innovatsii i eksperiment. 2019. No. 3 (66), pp. 48–55. (In Russian).
11. State program of the city of Moscow “Development of education in the city of Moscow (“Capital education “)”. Obrazovatel’naya politika. 2011. No. 3 (53), pp. 4–10. (In Russian).
12. Argunov S.V., Kogan Yu.V. Assessment of the need for social infrastructure facilities in the development and analysis of territorial planning projects that provide for the renovation of residential buildings. V kn.: Renovatsiya. Krupnomasshtabnyi gorodskoi proekt rassredotochennogo stroitel’stva. [In the book: Renovation. Large scale urban dispersed building project]. Moscow: Russkaya shkola. 2018, p. 196 https://dev-city.ru/uploads/s/w/f/v/wfvvbpgtz4tt/file/ho16Rvhi.pdf

For citation: Dolgushin A.V. Methodology for identifying territories within the boundaries of which it is advisable to place new objects of preschool and general education. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2020. No. 12, pp. 29–35. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2020-12-29-35


Print   Email