Design of Earthquake-Resistant Buildings. New Generation Standards

In modern practice of designing buildings in seismic areas, there is a constant increase in the level of detail of models, however, calculations often ignore the fact that seismic impact is a random process with large variability of parameters, and the interaction of the structure with a nonlinearly deformable foundation is not always taken into account correctly. In addition, when calculating seismic impacts, it is necessary to use modern material models that take into account the nonlinear nature of deformation under cyclic loads. All the factors described above indicate the need to develop complex methods for calculating seismic impacts. The article describes an integrated approach to the calculations of buildings and structures being built in seismic areas, and also provides the main theses for the STO “Construction in seismic areas. Basic provisions”. The section “materials used and research methods” presents the key components of the proposed methodology (nonlinear calculation method, material models and foundation model). The section “research results” presents the main provisions of the proposed two-level calculation. In conclusion, it was concluded that it is necessary to update modern standards and methods of calculation for seismic impacts.

O.V. MKRTYCHEV, Doctor of Sciences (Engineering) (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.),
E.M. LOKHOVA, Engineer (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)

National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (26, Yaroslavskoe Highway, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation)

1. Мкртычев О.В. Развитие прямых нелинейных динамических методов расчета на сейсмические воздействия // Промышленное и гражданское строительство. 2022. № 7. С. 12–16. DOI: 10.33622/0869-7019.2022.07
1. Mkrtychev O.V. Development of direct nonlinear dynamic methods for calculating seismic impacts. Promyshlennoe i grazhdanskoe stroitel’stvo. 2022. No. 7, pp. 12–16. (In Russian). DOI: 10.33622/0869-7019.2022.07
2. Рекунов С.С., Чураков А.А. Исследование вопросов надежности сооружений разных типов при экстремальных воздействиях. Ч. 1. // Инженерно-строительный вестник Прикаспия. 2023. № 2 (44). С. 57–61. DOI: 10.52684/2312-3702-2023-44-2-57-61
2. Rekunov S.S., Churakov A.A. Study of reliability issues of structures of different types under extreme influences. Part one. Inzhenerno-stroitel’nyj vestnik. 2023. No. 2 (44), pp. 57–61. (In Russian). DOI: 10.52684/2312-3702-2023-44-2-57-61
3. Murray Y.D. Users manual for LS-DYNA. Concrete material model 159-HRT-05-062. 2007. 77 p.
4. Тяпин А.Г. Различия в нормативных подходах к расчету на сейсмические воздействия гражданских сооружений и сооружений АЭС. Ч. 2. Взаимодействие сооружения с основанием // Сейсмостойкое строительство. Безопасность сооружений. 2014. № 6. C. 14–17.
4. Tyapin A.G. Differences in regulatory approaches to the calculation of seismic impacts of civil structures and nuclear power plant structures. Part II. Interaction of the structure with the foundation. Sejsmostojkoe stroitel’stvo. Bezopasnost’ sooruzhenij. 2014. No. 6, pp. 14–17. (In Russian).
5. Arnkjell Løkke, Anil K. Chopra direct-finite-element method for nonlinear earthquake analysis of concrete dams including dam–water–foundation rock interaction. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center-Headquarters at the University of California Report. 2019. No. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55461/CRJY2161
6. Dhrubajyoti Datta, Amit H. Varma, Jungil Seo and Justin Coleman. Investigation of interface non-linearity on Non-linear Soil Structure Interaction analyses. 24th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, SMiRT-24. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326316988_Investigation_of_interface_non-linearity_on_Non-linear_Soil_Structure_Interaction_analyses (Date of access 25.03.24)
7. Justin Coleman, Chandrakanth Bolisetti. Time-domain soil-structure interaction analysis of nuclear facilities. Nuclear Engineering and Design. No. 298, pp. 264–270. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290396062_Time-domain_soil-structure_interaction_analysis_of_nuclear_facilities?_tp=eyJjb250ZXh0Ijp7ImZpcnN0UGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIiwicGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIn19 (Date of access 25.03.24)
8. Мкртычев О.В., Дударева М.С. Учет совместной работы железобетонного здания с грунтом основания при интенсивном сейсмическом воздействии // Строительство: наука и образование. 2018. Т. 8. № 2 (28). С. 37–48.
8. Mkrtychev O.V., Dudareva M.S. Accounting for the joint work of a reinforced concrete building with the foundation soil under intense seismic influence. Stroitel’stvo: nauka i obrazovanie. 2018. Vol. 8. No. 2 (28), pp. 37–48. (In Russian).
9. Mkrtychev O.V., Reshetov A.A. Modeling Worst-case Earthquake Accelerograms for Buildings and Structures. Advances in Engineering Research. 2016. Vol. 72, pp. 89–94. DOI: 10.2991/aece-16.2017.21
10. Mkrtychev O.V., Busalova M.S. Assessment of seismic resistance of the reinforced concrete building by nonlinear dynamic method. Advances in Engineering Research. 2016. Vol. 104, pp. 160–164. DOI: 10.2991/icmcm-16.2016.33
11. Reshetov A.A., Lokhova E.M. Assessment of the influence of the rotational components of seismic action on the SSS of a multistorey reinforced concrete building. International Journal for Computational Civil and Structural Engineering. March 2022. No. 18 (1), pp. 82–91. DOI: 10.22337/2587-9618-2022-18-1-82-91
12. Белостоцкий А.М., Акимов П.А., Павлов А.С. О численном моделировании физически нелинейной динамической реакции зданий и сооружений при сейсмических воздействиях, заданных акселерограммами. Сборник научных трудов ­РААСН. Москва. 2020. С. 105–112.
12. Belostotsky A.M., Akimov P.A., Pavlov A.S. On numerical modeling of the physically nonlinear dynamic response of buildings and structures under seismic impacts specified by accelerograms. Collection of scientific works of RAASN. Moscow. 2020, pp. 105–112.
13. Mkrtychev O.V., Lokhova E.M. Accumulation of damage in reinforced concrete elements under cyclic loads. IOP Conferece Series: Materials Science Engineering. Moscow. 2021. Vol. 1015, pp. 012038. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/1015/1/012038
14. Курбацкий Е.Н., Мондрус В.Л., Пестрякова Е.А. К вопросу о корректном задании исходной сейсмической информации // ACADEMIA. Архитектура и строительство. 2021. № 1. С. 134–143.
14. Kurbatsky E.N., Mondrus V.L., Pestryakova E.A. On the issue of correct assignment of initial seismic information. ACADEMIA. Arhitektura i stroitel’stvo. 2021. No. 1, pp. 134–143. (In Russian).
15. Дорожинский В.Б. Нелинейные методы расчетов при проведении научно-технического сопровождения // Промышленное и гражданское строительство. 2022. № 10. С. 32–36. DOI: 10.33622/0869-7019.2022.10.32-36
15. Dorozhinsky V.B. Nonlinear calculation methods for scientific and technical support. Promyshlennoe i grazhdanskoe stroitel’stvo. 2022. No. 10, pp. 32–36. (In Russian). DOI: 10.33622/0869-7019.2022.10.32-36
16. Мкртычев О.В., Решетов А.А. Представительный набор акселерограмм для расчета на сейсмические воздействия // Промышленное и гражданское строительство. 2023. № 9. С. 43–50. DOI: 10.33622/0869-7019.2023.09.43-50
16. Mkrtychev O.V., Reshetov A.A. Representative set of accelerograms for calculation of seismic influences. Promyshlennoe i grazhdanskoe stroitel’stvo. 2023. No. 9, pp. 43–50. (In Russian). DOI: 10.33622/0869-7019.2023.09.43-50