Reglamentation of Urban Planning Activities in St. Petersburg in the 18th – 19th Centuries and its Technical Consequences

Number of journal: 9-2023
Autors:

Shashkin A.G.,
Shashkin V.A.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2023-9-86-101
УДК: 728.03

 

AbstractAbout AuthorsReferences
The technical aspects of the history of the urban development of St. Petersburg are considered, which make it possible to form a general idea of the features and patterns of historical development, which is necessary for assessing the state and deformation behavior of residential buildings erected in the 18th - 19th centuries. On the basis of the works of well-known researchers of the formation of the historical center of the Northern capital, it is demonstrated that the planning of the quarters of the urban environment, the development of individual households was subject to strict regulation in terms of layout, building dimensions in terms of plan and height, which led to the emergence of buildings with certain ratios of facade length to height and width in cross section. For the construction of the capital of the Russian Empire and other historical cities, “exemplary” projects, albums of “exemplary” facades were used, which should have been guided during construction, and a typical division of quarters into separate sections was recommended. Perimeter (“firewall”) development of plots led to the formation of a characteristic type of building with a two-span front structure along the red line of the street and predominantly single-span courtyard buildings forming closed courtyards. At the same time, the front structures, due to the presence of a system of longitudinal and transverse walls, turned out to have significantly greater spatial rigidity than the courtyard ones. It is shown that the urban development of the capital was characterized by a gradual increase in the number of storeys and compaction of building sites, which led to the mutual influence of buildings of a later construction on the previously erected ones.
A.G. SHASHKIN, Doctor of Sciences (Geology and Mineralogy) (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.),
V.A. SHASHKIN, Candidate of Sciences (Engineering) (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)

Institute “Georeconstruction” (4, Izmaylovskiy pr. Saint-Petersburg, 190005. Russian Federation)

1. Sementsov S.V. Formation of the principles of preservation of the architectural and urban heritage of St. Petersburg based on the patterns of three-century urban development. Vestnik SPbGU. 2013. Vol. 15. Iss. 2, pp. 190–211. (In Russian).
2. Sementsov S.V. Urban planning component of the residential function of St. Petersburg and the St. Petersburg agglomeration. 1703–2006. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. 2007. Iss. 3, pp. 63–70. (In Russian).
3. Peterburg neuznavaemyi v akvarelyakh F.F. Bagantsa [Petersburg unrecognizable in watercolors by F.F. Bagants]. Saint Petersburg: Kriga, 2005. 96 p.
4. Mintslov S.R. Peterburg v 1903–1910 godakh [Petersburg in 1903–1910]. B.m.: Salamandra P.V.V. 2012. 287  p.
5. Babinovich N.U., Sitnikova E.V. “Exemplary” construction in the cities of Russia and Tomsk. Vestnik TGASU. 2020. Vol. 22. No. 5, pp. 25–35. (In Russian).
6. Gladkikh A.A. Projects of “Exemplary” residential houses by D.A. Trezini in St. Petersburg. Privolzhskii nauchnyi vestnik. 2015. No. 6–1, pp. 32–35. (In Russian).
7. Rebrova R. The Palace of Fyodor Apraksin and the “model house” of J.-B. Leblon: the activity of a French architect in St. Petersburg according to new sources. Quaestio Rossica. 2018. Vol. 6. No. 1, pp. 130–138. (In Russian).
8. Shcheboleva E.G., Rudchenko V.M. Architecture of the province. Istoriya russkogo iskusstva. 2011. Vol. 14, pp. 165–259. (In Russian).
9. Yukhneva E.D. Peterburgskie dokhodnye doma. Ocherki iz istorii byta. Neizvestnye fakty i novye podrobnosti [Petersburg apartment houses. Essays from the history of everyday life. Unknown facts and new details]. Moscow: Tsentrpoligraf. 2021. 496 p.
10. Klimenko Yu.G. Komissiya o stroenii Moskvy. Arkhitekturnye yubilei. Kalendar’ pamyatnykh dat 2012–2016 [Commission on the structure of Moscow. Architectural anniversaries. Calendar of memorable dates 2012–2016]. Moscow: Izdatel’skii dom Rudentsovykh. 2012, pp. 123–125.
11. Kuznetsov D.I. Betankur [Betancourt]. Moscow: Veche. 2013. 480 p.
12. Sementsov S.V. St. Petersburg at the end of the XIX century: spontaneous development or preservation of traditions of the ensemble solution of the urban environment. Vestnik grazhdanskikh inzhenerov. 2017. No. 6 (65), pp. 55–64. (In Russian).
13. Sharlygina K.A. Experience of reconstruction of historical residential buildings of St. Petersburg. St. Petersburg: Petropolis. 2019. 136 p.
14. Golovina S.G. Architectural and structural features of residential buildings in St. Petersburg of the second half of the XVIII century. Gradostroitel’stvo i arkhitektura. 2020. Vol. 10. No. 2, pp. 71–77. (In Russian).
15. Ulitsky V.M., Shashkin A.G., Shashkin K.G. Geotechnical support of urban development. Saint Petersburg: «Stroiizdat Severo-Zapad», «Georekonstruktsiya». 2010. 551 p.

For citation: Shashkin A.G., Shashkin V.A. Reglamentation of urban planning activities in St. Petersburg in the 18th – 19th centuries and its technical consequences. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2023. No. 9, pp. 86–101. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2023-9-86-101


Print   Email