On the Criteria for the Deficiency of Seismic Resistance During the Operation of Housing Facilities in Seismically Active Territories

Number of journal: 3-2023
Autors:

Guryev V.V.,
Dorofeev V.M.,
Akbiev R.T.,
Bulykin V.I.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2023-3-50-61
УДК: 699.841

 

AbstractAbout AuthorsReferences
The article is devoted to issues related to the prevention of the consequences of natural and man-made impacts on the housing stock of the Russian Federation located in seismically active regions. Approaches for assessing the deficit of seismic resistance of objects based on the use of two digital databases are considered: seismological with information about the seismic hazard of the territory with records of ground vibration parameters and engineering seismometric with information about seismic resistance classes of buildings and structures with records of dynamic parameters of structures based on automated monitoring that provides a prediction of the consequences of natural and technogenic impacts on construction objects. The features of the housing stock in seismically active areas, including its structure, and the problems of assessing the deficit of seismic resistance of construction objects are considered, the result of the analysis of information received from the constituent entities of the Russian Federation located in seismically active regions is given, the identified systemic problems related to determining the deficit of seismic resistance of apartment buildings are indicated. A technology for assessing and monitoring mechanical safety during the operation of buildings and structures based on the digitalization of the processes of registering external influences and responses of structures to these influences, predicting changes in the seismic resistance of buildings, their accounting, certification and strengthening, is proposed. Proposals are made to ensure earthquake resistance during the operation of housing stock facilities located in seismically active areas and to minimize the negative consequences of seismic impacts.
V.V. GURYEV1, Doctor of Sciences (Engineering), Head of the Department of Seismic Safety and Disaster Risk Reduction, (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.),
V.M. DOROFEEV2, Candidate of Sciences ((Physics and Mathematics), Scientific Supervisor (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.),
R.T. AKBIEV1, Candidate of Sciences (Engineering), Head of the Department of Comprehensive Urban Planning Safety, (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.),
V.I. BULYKIN3, Chief Specialist of the Independent Structural Unit “Regional projects”(This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)

1 Central Research and Design Institute of the Ministry of Construction, Housing and Utilities of the Russian Federation (29, Vernadskogo Avenue, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation)
2 Specialized scientific and technical enterprise “PROFINZH” (SSTE PROFINZH”) (22, bldg. 3, Boytsovaya Street, Moscow, 107150, Russian Federation)
3 Public Law Company “Territory Development Fund” (PLC “Territory Development Fund” (5, Sharikopodshipnikovskaya Street, Moscow, 107150, Russian Federation)

1. Methodological recommendations for the engineering analysis of the consequences of earthquakes. Moscow: TSNIISK; MSSSS. 1980. 78 p.
2. Methodical manual on certification of buildings and structures in seismic areas. Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky: DALNIIS. 1990. 93 p.
3. Methodological recommendations for the survey and certification of existing housing stock, social and cultural buildings and industrial enterprises in seismic areas of the Irkutsk region. Irkutsk: IZK SB RAS. 1991.
4. Savin S.N., Artemyev A.N., Petrunin K.L. Methodological aspects of the construction of buildings and engineering structures in earthquake-prone areas. Seismostoikoe stroitel’stvo. Bezopasnost’ sooruzhenii. 1998. No. 6, pp. 37–38. (In Russian).
5. Berzhinskaya L.P., Berzhinsky Yu.A. Methods of certification of buildings in seismic areas. Voprosy inzhenernoi seismologii. 2009. Vol. 36. No. 2, pp. 57–69. (In Russian).
6. Drozdyuk V.N. Methodology for the survey of typical buildings in order to determine their seismic resistance and the need for seismic reinforcement. Technical regulations of Kamchatka TRK01-2009. Approved by the Ministry of Construction of the Kamchatka Territory on April 20, 2005. GUP “Kamchatskgrazhdanproekt”. 2009.
7. Dorofeev V.M. Monitoring of the state of buildings and structures of the existing development of cities prone to natural and manmade disasters. Problemy bezopasnosti pri chrezvychainykh situatsiyakh. 1998. No. 6, pp. 16–26. (In Russian).
8. Dorofeev V.M. On the safety of the operation of load-bearing structures of buildings and structures and practical ways to ensure it. Vestnik Rosiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya problemy kompleksnoi bezopasnosti. 2004. No. 1, pp. 44–52. (In Russian).
9. Dorofeev V.M., Denisov A.S. Forecast of the consequences of strong earthquakes. Prirodnye i tekhnogennye riski. Bezopasnost’ sooruzhenii. 2019. No. 1 (38), pp. 28–31. (In Russian).
10. Guryev V.V., Dorofeev V.M., Lysov D.A., Akbiev R.T. Fundamentals of monitoring of construction objects using the analysis of changes in their dynamic parameters. Academia. Arkhitektura i stroitel’stvo. 2021. No. 3, pp. 89–100. (In Russian).
11. Guryev V.V., Dorofeev V.M. On the problems of rationing the safety of built-up areas in seismic areas. Fundamental, claim and applied research of the RAASN on scientific support of the development of architecture, urban planning and the construction industry of the Russian Federation in 2019: Collection of scientific papers of the RAASN. Moscow: ASV. 2020, pp. 157–178.
12. Guryev V.V., Granev V.V., Dmitriev A.N., Dorofeev V.M., Kelasyev N.G., Lysov D.A. The experience of using automated monitoring stations on unique construction sites. Promyshlennoe i grazhdanskoe stroitel’stvo. 2021. No. 11, pp. 4–12. (In Russian).
13. Dorofeev V.M. Conceptual foundations of the functioning and development of the service of engineering seismometric observations. Stroitel’stvo i arkhitektura. Seismostoikoe stroitel’stvo. 1996. Ser. 14. Iss. 1, pp. 26–29. (In Russian).
14. Patent RF 2654830. Tsifrovaya inzhenerno-seismometricheskaya stantsiya s sistemoi monitoringa tekhnicheskogo sostoyaniya zdanii ili sooruzhenii. Guryev V.V., Dorofeev V.M., Lysov D.A., Denisov A.S., Katrenko V.G. Declared 23.06.2017. (In Russian).
15. Patent RF 2654831. Sposob mnogokanal’noi registratsii seismiche-skikh kolebanii na inzhenerno-seismometricheskoi stantsii. Guryev V.V., Dorofeev V.M., Lysov D.A., Denisov A.S., Katrenko V.G. Declared 23.06.2017. (In Russian).
16. Patent RF 2655462. Seismicheskii pribor dlya izmereniya dinamicheskikh vozdeistvii pri monitoringe tekhnicheskogo sostoyaniya nesushchikh konstruktsii zdanii i sooruzhenii. Guryev V.V., Dorofeev V.M., Lysov D.A., Denisov A.S., Katrenko V.G. Declared 23.06.2017. (In Russian).

For citation: Guryev V.V., Dorofeev V.M., Akbiev R.T., Bulykin V.I. On the criteria for the deficiency of seismic resistance during the operation of housing facilities in seismically active territories. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2023. No. 3, pp. 50–61. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2023-3-50-61


Print   Email