AbstractAbout AuthorsReferences
The processes of drinking water treatment are associated with the need to ensure strict compliance of its quality with modern requirements of sanitary and hygienic legislation. Thus, the choice of water treatment technologies in the implementation of modernization or new construction programs should be based on modern approaches that are the key to ensuring the proper quality of drinking water with sufficient provision of the water treatment process in the technological aspect. The requirements for the design of treatment facilities described in the current codes of practice should be updated to enable designers to assess the reliability of water treatment technology, taking into account the hidden risks associated with both technological factors and the likelihood of negative impacts on consumers, which ultimately determines the total cost of operating drinking water supply systems throughout the life cycle. The authors demonstrate the integration of the life cycle cost estimation of drinking water treatment technology and the relationship of this technology with probable risks.
G.A. SAMBURSKY1,2, Candidate of Sciences (Engineering) (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.);
V.I. BAZHENOV1,3, Doctor of Sciences (Engineering);
D.B. FROG4, Candidate of Sciences (Engineering)
V.I. BAZHENOV1,3, Doctor of Sciences (Engineering);
D.B. FROG4, Candidate of Sciences (Engineering)
1 Russian Water Supply & Water Disposal Association (35, bldg.2, Mosfilmovskaya Street, Moscow, 119330 Russian Federation)
2 MIREA-Russian Technological University, (78, Vernadsky Avenue, Moscow, 119454, Russian Federation)
3 CJSC “Water Supply and Water Disposal” (1, Polkovaya Street, Moscow, 127018, Russian Federation)
4 Research Institute of Building Physics of the Russian Academy of Architecture and Construction Sciences (21, Lokomotivniy Driveway, Moscow, 127238, Russian Federation)
1. Spravochnik perspektivnyh tekhnologij vodopodgotovki i ochistki vody s ispol’zovaniem tekhnologij, razrabotannyh organizaciyami oboronno-promyshlennogo kompleksa i uchetom ocenki riska zdorov’yu naseleniya [Handbook of promising technologies for water treatment and water purification using technologies developed by military-industrial organizations of the complex and taking into account the risk assessment to public health]. Moscow. https://minstroyrf.gov.ru/docs/18492/. Accessed 01.04.2021. (In Russian).
2. Plitman S.I., Tulakin A.V., Sambursky G.A., et al. Himiya. Okruzhayushchaya sreda. Zdorov’e [Chemistry. Environment. Health]. Ed. Academician N.F. Izmerova. Moscow: Publishing house of technical literature. 2016. 382 p.
3. Sambursky G.A., Grodzensky S.Yu. Approaches to risk assessment and the choice of water purification technologies to provide consumers with high-quality drinking water. Amazonia Investiga. 2020. Vol. 9 (25), pp. 33–43. Retrieved from https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/1024
4. Sambursky G.A., Nefedova E.D. Approaches to risk assessment and the choice of water treatment technologies for providing consumers with high-quality drinking water. Vodoochistka. Vodopodgotovka. Vodosnabzhenie. 2020. No. 2 (146), pp. 48–56. (In Russian).
5. Camilla West, Stephen Kenway, Maureen Hassall, Zhigo Yuan. Why do residential water recycling schemes fail? A comprehensive review of risk factors and their impact on the goals. Water Research. 2016. 102, pp. 271–281. www.elsevier.com/locate/watres.
6. Arjen Y. Hoekstra. Water footprint assessment: evolvement of a new research field. Water resources management. 2017. August 31:3061-3081. DOI 10.1007/s11269-017-1618-5
7. Boulay A-M., Bulle C., Deschenes L., Margni M. LCA characterization of freshwater use on human health and through compensation. In: Towards life cycle Sustainability management. SpringerLink. 2011b, pp. 193–204.
8. Bazhenov V.I., Pupyrev E.I., Sambursky G.A., Berezin S.E. Development of a methodology for calculating the cost of the life cycle of equipment, systems and structures for water supply and sanitation. Vodosnabzhenie i sanitarnaya tekhnika. 2018. No. 2, pp. 10–19. (In Russian).
9. UNEP-SETAC, Life Cycle Initiative (2017) Global Guide to Life Cycle Impact Assessment Indicators (Volume 1). Edited by Rolf Frischknecht and Olivier Jolier. Retrieved from http://www.lifecycleinitiative.org/applying-lca/lcia-cf/.
10. Spellman F.R. Handbook for the treatment of natural and waste water. Water supply and sewerage (St. Petersburg: 2014 TsOP Profession) 1312 p.
11. Pfister S., Boulay A-M., Berger M. et al. Understanding the LCA and ISO Water Footprint: a response to Hoekstra’s (2016) criticism of the suspended water footprint taking into account water scarcity in the LCA. 2017. Ecological Index 72: 352–359.
12. Sambursky G.A., Pestov S.A. Tekhnologicheskie i organizacionnye aspekty processov polucheniya vody pit’evogo kachestva [Technological and organizational aspects of the processes of obtaining drinking quality water]. Moscow: Izdatel’skie resheniya. 2017. 184 p.
13. Boulay A-M. et al. The WULCA consensus characterization model for water scarcity footprints: assessing impacts of water consumption based on available water remaining. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2017. Vol. 23 (2), http://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1333-8
2. Plitman S.I., Tulakin A.V., Sambursky G.A., et al. Himiya. Okruzhayushchaya sreda. Zdorov’e [Chemistry. Environment. Health]. Ed. Academician N.F. Izmerova. Moscow: Publishing house of technical literature. 2016. 382 p.
3. Sambursky G.A., Grodzensky S.Yu. Approaches to risk assessment and the choice of water purification technologies to provide consumers with high-quality drinking water. Amazonia Investiga. 2020. Vol. 9 (25), pp. 33–43. Retrieved from https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/1024
4. Sambursky G.A., Nefedova E.D. Approaches to risk assessment and the choice of water treatment technologies for providing consumers with high-quality drinking water. Vodoochistka. Vodopodgotovka. Vodosnabzhenie. 2020. No. 2 (146), pp. 48–56. (In Russian).
5. Camilla West, Stephen Kenway, Maureen Hassall, Zhigo Yuan. Why do residential water recycling schemes fail? A comprehensive review of risk factors and their impact on the goals. Water Research. 2016. 102, pp. 271–281. www.elsevier.com/locate/watres.
6. Arjen Y. Hoekstra. Water footprint assessment: evolvement of a new research field. Water resources management. 2017. August 31:3061-3081. DOI 10.1007/s11269-017-1618-5
7. Boulay A-M., Bulle C., Deschenes L., Margni M. LCA characterization of freshwater use on human health and through compensation. In: Towards life cycle Sustainability management. SpringerLink. 2011b, pp. 193–204.
8. Bazhenov V.I., Pupyrev E.I., Sambursky G.A., Berezin S.E. Development of a methodology for calculating the cost of the life cycle of equipment, systems and structures for water supply and sanitation. Vodosnabzhenie i sanitarnaya tekhnika. 2018. No. 2, pp. 10–19. (In Russian).
9. UNEP-SETAC, Life Cycle Initiative (2017) Global Guide to Life Cycle Impact Assessment Indicators (Volume 1). Edited by Rolf Frischknecht and Olivier Jolier. Retrieved from http://www.lifecycleinitiative.org/applying-lca/lcia-cf/.
10. Spellman F.R. Handbook for the treatment of natural and waste water. Water supply and sewerage (St. Petersburg: 2014 TsOP Profession) 1312 p.
11. Pfister S., Boulay A-M., Berger M. et al. Understanding the LCA and ISO Water Footprint: a response to Hoekstra’s (2016) criticism of the suspended water footprint taking into account water scarcity in the LCA. 2017. Ecological Index 72: 352–359.
12. Sambursky G.A., Pestov S.A. Tekhnologicheskie i organizacionnye aspekty processov polucheniya vody pit’evogo kachestva [Technological and organizational aspects of the processes of obtaining drinking quality water]. Moscow: Izdatel’skie resheniya. 2017. 184 p.
13. Boulay A-M. et al. The WULCA consensus characterization model for water scarcity footprints: assessing impacts of water consumption based on available water remaining. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2017. Vol. 23 (2), http://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1333-8
For citation: Sambursky G.A., Bazhenov V.I., Frog D.B. Principles of estimating the cost of the life cycle of water treatment technologies when implementing the "Clean Water" Federal Project. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2021. No. 7, pp. 42–47. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2021-7-42-47