AbstractAbout AuthorsReferences
According to a number of regulatory documents of the Russian Federation of construction content, more than half of the vast territory of Russia may be exposed to the effects of natural hazards, so the main goal of the Russian construction system in these territories should be the protection of settlements in the event of possible natural hazards. The construction system of Russia must take into account the conclusion of scientists that the place, time and intensity of the next dangerous natural phenomenon cannot be predicted today. To protect settlements against dangerous natural influences, the construction system of Russia is obliged to recognize them as objects of capital construction. But the modern paradigm of the Russian building system does not recognize settlements as objects of capi-tal construction. That is why the federal laws and regulations of the Russian Federation of construction content provide for the calculation of the most mass residential and public buildings only for the most minimal dangerous environmental impacts. Moreover, even to the catastrophic flooding of many settlements that have recurred in recent years in Russia, there is no professional reaction of the government of the Russian Federation in the form, for example, of a conclusion on the main engineering causes of their flooding and specific measures to eliminate them. The article substantiates the author’s paradigm for the construction system of Russia, the main purpose of which is to recognize the settlements of Russia as the largest objects of capital construction with their calculation on the impact of the maximum dangerous natural phenomena.
A.V. MASLYAEV, Candidate of Sciences (Engineering) (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)
Seismic Research Laboratory (27, bldg. A, rm 51, Zemlyachki Street, Volgograd, 400117, Russian Federation)
1. Aptikaev F.F., Maslyaev A.V. Protection of life and health of people is not recognized as the main goal in the construction of buildings in Russia. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2019. No. 11, pp. 58–64. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2019-11-58-64
2. Maslyaev A.V. Russian settlements are not protected against the impact of natural hazards. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2019. No. 5, pp. 36–42. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2019-5-36-42
3. Maslyaev A.V. Calculation of buildings and structures to preserve the life and health of people during an earthquake. Zhilishnoe Stroitelstvo [Housing Construction]. 2009. No. 8, pp. 33–35. (In Russian).
4. Godzikovskaya A.A., Sergeeva N.A., Zabarinskaya L.P. Regional catalogs of earthquakes in Russia. Seismicheskie pribory. 2009. Vol. 45. No. 2, pp. 58–76. (In Russian).
5. Erteleva O.O., Aptikaev F.F. Creation of a bank of regional synthetic accelerograms. Voprosy inzhenernoi seismologii. 2016. Vol. 43. No. 2, pp. 36–42. (In Russian).
6. Sidorin A.Ya. 1988 Spitak earthquake and some prob-lems of engineering seismology. Voprosy inzhenernoi seismologii. 2018. Vol. 45. No. 4, pp. 106–118. (In Russian).
7. Maslyaev A.V. Substantiation of the matrix model of execution in RF Federal laws and normative documents of construction content. Zhilishnoe Stroitelstvo [Housing Construction]. 2018. No. 11, pp. 41–47. (In Russian).
8. Maslyaev V.N., Maslyaev A.V. Influence of the spaceplanning decisions of the building on the reaction of people during an earthquake. Zhilishnoe Stroitelstvo [Housing Construction]. 1991. No. 7, pp. 9–10. (In Russian).
9. Maslyaev A.V. Short life of residential buildings in settlements of Russia. Zhilishnoe Stroitelstvo [Housing Construction]. 2017. No. 8. pp. 3–42. (In Russian).
10. Maslyaev A.V. Dependence of the city’s earthquake protection on the level of responsibility of residential buildings». Prirodnye i tekhnogennye riski. Bezopasnost’ sooruzhenii. 2013. No. 5, pp. 29–32. (In Russian).
11. Maslyaev A.V. Seismoprotection of the city at an earthquake depending on a level of responsibility of residential buildings. Vestnik VolgGASU. Stroitelstvo i Architectura. 2013. No. 33 (52), pp. 57–62. (In Russian).
12. Maslyaev A.V. Construction system of Russia does not protect the lifes and health of people in settlements during the earthquake. Zhilishnoe Stroitelstvo [Housing Construction]. 2018. No. 9, pp. 60–63. (In Russian).
13. Maslyaev A.V. About absence in Federal regulatory documents of requirements of the Federal law No. 384-FZ of protection of life and health of citizens in buildings at earthquakes. Prirodnye i tekhnogennye riski. Bezopasnost’ sooruzhenii. 2014. No. 3, pp. 32–34. (In Russian).
14. Ulomov V.I., Shumilina L.S. The Complete set of cards of the general seismic division into districts of territory of Russian Federation OSR-97. Scale 1: 8,000,000. An explanatory note and the list of cities and the settlements located in seismodangerous areas. Moscow: Ministry of a science and technologies of the Russian Federation. RAN. Incorporated institute of physics of the Earth of O.Yu. Schmidt. 1999.
15. Maslyaev A.V. Time between the first pushes of an earthquake to Haiti was determined in advance. Zhilishnoe Stroitelstvo [Housing Construction]. 2010. No. 2. pp. 26–27. (In Russian).
16. Maslyaev A.V. On the need to introduce the requirements of the Federal law of the Russian Federation No. 384-FZ on the protection of life and health of people in buildings during an earthquake into Federal normative documents. Vestnik VolgGASU. Stroitelstvo i Architectura. 2014. No. 37 (56), pp. 57–62. (In Russian).
17. Maslyaev A.V. Paradigm of Federal laws and regulations of the Russian Federation for seismic protection of buildings with increased responsibility in the event of an earthquake. Vestnik VolgGASU. Stroitelstvo i Architectura. 2015. No. 41 (60), pp. 74–84. (In Russian).
18. Maslyaev V.N. Substantiation of protection of life and health of the Russian population in earthquake zones in Federal laws and regulations of the Russian Federation. Vestnik VolgGASU. Stroitelstvo i Architectura. 2015. No. 39 (58), pp. 94–100. (In Russian).
19. Maslyaev A.V. Seismic danger in territory of the Volgograd region is understated by standard cards OSR-97 the Russian Federation at the expense of simplification of tectonic conditions. Seismostoikoe stroitel’stvo. Bezopasnost sooruzhenii. 2011. No. 6, pp. 46–49. (In Russian).
20. Maslyaev A.V. Seismozashchita zdanii v naselennykh punktakh dlya sokhraneniya zhizni i zdorov’ya lyu-dei pri zemletryasenii [Seismic protection of buildings in populated areas to preserve the life and health of people in case of an earthquake]. Volgograd: VolgGTU, 2018. 149 p.
21. Hain V.E., Lomize M.G. Geotectonica s osnovami geodynamiki [Geotectonica with geodynamics bases]. Moscow: MGU. 1995. 480 p.
2. Maslyaev A.V. Russian settlements are not protected against the impact of natural hazards. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2019. No. 5, pp. 36–42. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2019-5-36-42
3. Maslyaev A.V. Calculation of buildings and structures to preserve the life and health of people during an earthquake. Zhilishnoe Stroitelstvo [Housing Construction]. 2009. No. 8, pp. 33–35. (In Russian).
4. Godzikovskaya A.A., Sergeeva N.A., Zabarinskaya L.P. Regional catalogs of earthquakes in Russia. Seismicheskie pribory. 2009. Vol. 45. No. 2, pp. 58–76. (In Russian).
5. Erteleva O.O., Aptikaev F.F. Creation of a bank of regional synthetic accelerograms. Voprosy inzhenernoi seismologii. 2016. Vol. 43. No. 2, pp. 36–42. (In Russian).
6. Sidorin A.Ya. 1988 Spitak earthquake and some prob-lems of engineering seismology. Voprosy inzhenernoi seismologii. 2018. Vol. 45. No. 4, pp. 106–118. (In Russian).
7. Maslyaev A.V. Substantiation of the matrix model of execution in RF Federal laws and normative documents of construction content. Zhilishnoe Stroitelstvo [Housing Construction]. 2018. No. 11, pp. 41–47. (In Russian).
8. Maslyaev V.N., Maslyaev A.V. Influence of the spaceplanning decisions of the building on the reaction of people during an earthquake. Zhilishnoe Stroitelstvo [Housing Construction]. 1991. No. 7, pp. 9–10. (In Russian).
9. Maslyaev A.V. Short life of residential buildings in settlements of Russia. Zhilishnoe Stroitelstvo [Housing Construction]. 2017. No. 8. pp. 3–42. (In Russian).
10. Maslyaev A.V. Dependence of the city’s earthquake protection on the level of responsibility of residential buildings». Prirodnye i tekhnogennye riski. Bezopasnost’ sooruzhenii. 2013. No. 5, pp. 29–32. (In Russian).
11. Maslyaev A.V. Seismoprotection of the city at an earthquake depending on a level of responsibility of residential buildings. Vestnik VolgGASU. Stroitelstvo i Architectura. 2013. No. 33 (52), pp. 57–62. (In Russian).
12. Maslyaev A.V. Construction system of Russia does not protect the lifes and health of people in settlements during the earthquake. Zhilishnoe Stroitelstvo [Housing Construction]. 2018. No. 9, pp. 60–63. (In Russian).
13. Maslyaev A.V. About absence in Federal regulatory documents of requirements of the Federal law No. 384-FZ of protection of life and health of citizens in buildings at earthquakes. Prirodnye i tekhnogennye riski. Bezopasnost’ sooruzhenii. 2014. No. 3, pp. 32–34. (In Russian).
14. Ulomov V.I., Shumilina L.S. The Complete set of cards of the general seismic division into districts of territory of Russian Federation OSR-97. Scale 1: 8,000,000. An explanatory note and the list of cities and the settlements located in seismodangerous areas. Moscow: Ministry of a science and technologies of the Russian Federation. RAN. Incorporated institute of physics of the Earth of O.Yu. Schmidt. 1999.
15. Maslyaev A.V. Time between the first pushes of an earthquake to Haiti was determined in advance. Zhilishnoe Stroitelstvo [Housing Construction]. 2010. No. 2. pp. 26–27. (In Russian).
16. Maslyaev A.V. On the need to introduce the requirements of the Federal law of the Russian Federation No. 384-FZ on the protection of life and health of people in buildings during an earthquake into Federal normative documents. Vestnik VolgGASU. Stroitelstvo i Architectura. 2014. No. 37 (56), pp. 57–62. (In Russian).
17. Maslyaev A.V. Paradigm of Federal laws and regulations of the Russian Federation for seismic protection of buildings with increased responsibility in the event of an earthquake. Vestnik VolgGASU. Stroitelstvo i Architectura. 2015. No. 41 (60), pp. 74–84. (In Russian).
18. Maslyaev V.N. Substantiation of protection of life and health of the Russian population in earthquake zones in Federal laws and regulations of the Russian Federation. Vestnik VolgGASU. Stroitelstvo i Architectura. 2015. No. 39 (58), pp. 94–100. (In Russian).
19. Maslyaev A.V. Seismic danger in territory of the Volgograd region is understated by standard cards OSR-97 the Russian Federation at the expense of simplification of tectonic conditions. Seismostoikoe stroitel’stvo. Bezopasnost sooruzhenii. 2011. No. 6, pp. 46–49. (In Russian).
20. Maslyaev A.V. Seismozashchita zdanii v naselennykh punktakh dlya sokhraneniya zhizni i zdorov’ya lyu-dei pri zemletryasenii [Seismic protection of buildings in populated areas to preserve the life and health of people in case of an earthquake]. Volgograd: VolgGTU, 2018. 149 p.
21. Hain V.E., Lomize M.G. Geotectonica s osnovami geodynamiki [Geotectonica with geodynamics bases]. Moscow: MGU. 1995. 480 p.
For citation: Maslyaev A.V. Author’s paradigm of the Russian construction system. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2020. No. 1–2, pp. 65–71. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2020-1-2-65-71