Experience in Using the “up-down” Method When Constructing the Underground and Aboveground Parts of the Building

Number of journal: 9-2019
Autors:

Zuev S.S.
Makovetsky O.A.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2019-9-24-30
УДК: 624.151

 

AbstractAbout AuthorsReferences
Under the conditions of dense urban development, as well as the shortage of free sites, the underground construction is of particular relevance. However, local specifics and hydro-geological conditions make the task of constructing underground facilities very difficult. This encourages engineers to use new methods that ensure the safe operation of the surrounding development, make it possible to carry out the underground works at almost any depth, even under the most difficult engineering and geological conditions. One such method is «up-down”. This method makes it possible at the zero mark to perform the overlapping and continue the construction at the same time both up and down. This technology is relevant under the modern conditions of construction, as it makes it possible to erect buildings with less use of nearby areas. The article describes the principle of the method «up-down» and presents the order of work execution, considers the main advantages and disadvantages of this method, gives the results of geotechnical monitoring of the surrounding development.
S.S. ZUEV1, Deputy General Director
O.A. MAKOVETSKY2, Candidate of Sciences (Engineering)

1 OJSC “New Ground” (35, Kronshtadskaya Street, Perm, 614081, Russian Federation)
2 Perm National Research Polytechnic University (29, Komsomolsky Prospect, Perm, 614019, Russian Federation)

1. Abelev M.Yu., Krasnovsky B.M. Osobennosti tekhnologii provedeniya rabot po ustroistvu fundamentov [Peculiarities of the technology of works on installation of foundations]. Moscow. 1980. 45 p.
2. Abelev M.Yu. Deformatsii sooruzhenii v slozhnykh inzhenerno-geologicheskikh usloviyakh [Deformations of structures in difficult engineering and geological conditions]. Moscow: TsMIPKS pri MISI im. V.V. Kuibysheva. 1982. 290 c.
3. Stroitel’stvo zdanii i sooruzhenii v slozhnykh gruntovykh usloviyakh. Pod red. M.Yu. Abeleva [Construction of buildings and structures in difficult ground conditions. Edited by M.Y. Abelev]. Moscow: Stroyizdat. 1986. 104 p.
4. Katzenbach R., Schmitt A., Ramm H. Basic principles of design and monitoring of high-rise buildings Frankfurt-at-Main. Cases from practice. Rekonstruktsiya gorodov i geotekhnicheskoe stroitel’stvo. 2005. No. 9, pp. 80–99. (In Russian).
5. Konyuchov D.S. Stroitel’stvo gorodskikh podzemnykh sooruzhenii melkogo zalozheniya [Construction of urban underground structures]. Moscow: Architecture. 2005. 298 p.
6. Makovetskiy O.A., Tsydvintseva M.S., Makovetskaya K.O. Arrangement of structures of the underground part of the administrative building in Perm. Vestnik VolgGASU. Stroitel’stvo i arkhitektura. 2008. No. 10 (63), pp. 143–147. (In Russian).
7. Chang-Yu Ou. Deep Excavations. Theory and Practice. London: Taylor & Francis, 2006. 532 p.
8. Scherba V.G., Abelev K.M., Temples of D.V., Sagalakov G.V., Bahronov R.R. Peculiarities of provision of objects of construction of monolithic multi-storey buildings in tight urban conditions. Vestnik MGSU. 2008. No. 3, pp. 146–149. (In Russian).
9. Yurkevich P.B. Construction monolithic reinforced concrete overlapping at a half-closed way of construction underground a construction. Podzemnoe prostranstvo mira. 2002. No. 1, pp. 13–22. (In Russian).
10. Makovetskiy O., Zuev S. Practice device artificial improvement basis of soil technologies jet grouting. Procedia Engineering. 2016. Vol. 165, pp. 504–509.
11. Makovetsky O.A., Zuev S.S. Experience in conducting field tests of a barrette of long length under conditions of dense urban development. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2018. No. 9, pp. 13–18. (In Russian).

For citation: Zuev S.S., Makovetsky O.A. Experience in using the “up-down” method when constructing the underground and aboveground parts of the building. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2019. No. 9, pp. 24–30. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2019-9-24-30


Print   Email