System Approach to Formation of Recreation-Leisure Environment of Megapolis

Number of journal: 8-2018

Qing Xia,
Rodionovskaya I.S.

УДК: 379.8.093
AbstractAbout AuthorsReferences
The negative ecological quality of the modern architectural environment under the conditions of active development of the sub-urbanization in most large and largest cities of the world, makes the modern architecture look for new optimization ways of its spatial organization. As early as 1933 in Athens at the Fourth Congress of the International Organization of Architects (CIAM) the Athens Charter, which formulated and analyzed the four main functions of the city – work, housing, recreation and movement, was developed. The optimization approach to the formation of a full-fledged recreational space for the population of modern suburbanistic settlements is associated with active landscape improvement of the space, and in the style of traditional architecture at that. In China, the solution of this important problem is connected not only with the need to take into account the local natural conditions of the country and modern socio-urbanistic innovations, but also the ethno-cultural national context, historically established and existing today in this territory and planning of the development of recreational and leisure environment.
XIA QING, Architect (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.),
I.S. RODIONOVSKAYA, Candidate of Architecture (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)

Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (26, Yaroslavskoye Highway, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation)

1. Qing Xia, Rodionovskaya I.S. Organization of modern residential space in terms of eco-recreation in China. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2018. No. 7, pp. 22–26. (In Russian).
2. Rodionovskaya I.S., Qing Xia. Ethnic specificity of landscape-recreation area in living environment of China. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2018. No. 6, pp. 49–55. (In Russian).
3. Krasilnikova E.E., Goncharik A.A. Topical issues of landscape and urban macro systems formation (by the example of the Moscow agglomeration). Sociologiya goroda. 2017. No. 2, pp. 53–61. (In Russian).
4. Tetior A.N. Ecositilogy-the science of ecological cities. Evrazijskij soyuz uchenyh. 2016. No. 1–2 (22), pp. 138–142. (In Russian).
5. Bauer N.V., Shabatura L.N. Culture and tradition in the landscape design of the urban environment. Cennosti i smysly. 2014. No. 2 (30), pp. 155–161. (In Russian).
6. Sidorenko M.V. Prospects of organization of urban green corridors in Minsk (Belarus). Aktual’nye problemy lesnogo kompleksa. 2015. No. 43, pp. 138–142. (In Russian).
7. Strakhova V.N. Ecological diagnostics of the state of green spaces and ecosystems of the city. Gradostroitel’stvo. 2014. No. 6 (34), pp. 53–69. (In Russian).
8. Tseluiko D.S. Space syntax in the traditional Chinese private garden. Vestnik Tihookeanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2017. No. 4 (47), pp. 151–158. (In Russian).
9. Polyakov E.N., Mikhailova L.V. History of formation, the main varieties of the traditional Chinese garden. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo arhitekturno-stroitel’nogo universiteta. 2016. No. 6 (59), pp. 9–25. (In Russian).
10. Polyakov E.N., Mikhailova L.V. Compositional features of the traditional Chinese garden. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo arhitekturno-stroitel’nogo universiteta. 2017. No. 2 (61), pp. 9–31. (In Russian).
11. Qian Yun.ed. Classical Chinese Gardens. Hong Kong: Joint Publishing Company Ltd., 1982.
12. Turner Tom. Asia Gardens: history, beliefs and design. Abingdon, New York: Routledge, 2010.
13. Keswick Maggie.The Chinese Garden. History, art and architecture. London: Frances Lincoln, 2003.
14. Shuvalov V.M. Features of formation and development of leisure facilities in China. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo otkrytogo universiteta. Seriya: Tekhnika i tekhnologiya. 2012. No. 3, pp. 71–77. (In Russian).
15. Grosheva T.I. Planning structure of landscape and recreational objects of different times and epochs and their role in human life historical review. Foreign experience. Arhitekturnye issledovaniya. 2017. No. 1 (9), pp. 80–87. (In Russian).
16. Bazilevich A. M. The Classification and typology of objects of landscape architecture. Tvorchestvo i sovremennost’. 2017. No. 3 (4), pp. 5–11. (In Russian).
17. Ptichnikova G.A., Koroleva O.V. Hybridization of architecture in the city. Sociologiya goroda. 2016. No. 1, pp. 5–17. (In Russian).
18. Enin A.E., Grosheva T.I. System approach to the reconstruction of landscape and recreational spaces. Stroitel’stvo i rekonstrukciya. 2017. No. 4 (72), pp. 101–109. (In Russian).
19. Kerina E.N., Kerina A.R. review of landscape architecture features of the people’s Republic of China. Sovremennye naukoemkie tekhnologii. 2014. No. 8, pp. 45–49. (In Russian).

For citation: Qing Xia, Rodionovskaya I.S. System approach to formation of recreation-leisure environment of megapolis. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2018. No. 8, pp. 30–34. (In Russian). DOI:

Print   Email