АннотацияОб авторахСписок литературы
Рассматриваются особенности формирования быстровозводимых архитектурных объектов на основе 3D-печати в условиях многофакторных рисков. Цель статьи – выявление подходов к организации пространственной среды: технических и социальных. Первый тип включает технические разработки при проектировании, возведении и эксплуатации. Социальные концепции учитывают необходимые потребности человека. Исследование дает представление о методах и материалах, используемых в 3D-печати, а также о предпосылках развития аддитивного производства. Изучение научных трудов по исследуемой проблематике, смежным специальностям и опыта проектных разработок подтвердило необходимость учета технологических и социальных аспектов для реализации устойчивых решений при формировании быстровозводимых объектов на основе 3D-печати в условиях влияния антропогенных и природных факторов.
К.А. ПШЕНИЧНИКОВА, канд. архитектуры (Адрес электронной почты защищен от спам-ботов. Для просмотра адреса в вашем браузере должен быть включен Javascript.)
Московский архитектурный институт (государственная академия) (107031, г. Москва, ул. Рождественка, 11/4)
1. Saprykina N.A. Formation of architectural objects for extreme habitat conditions in the context of innovative paradigms. IIOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2019. 675. 10 p. EDN: KPPNSF. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/675/1/012017
2. Singh R., Sodhi A.K., Bhanot N. Investigation on the potential use of EAF dust and RSA for sustainable. Recycled Waste Materials. 2019, pp. 127–135.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7017-5_15
3. Javaid M., Haleem A. Current status and applications of additive manufacturing in dentistry: a literature-based revie. Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research. 2019. 9, pp. 179–185.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2019.04.004
4. Iftekar S.F., Aabid A., Amir A., Baig M. Advancements and limitations in 3D printing materials and technologies: a critical review. Polymers. 2023. 15 (11). 2519. EDN: BFZPAW.
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15112519
5. Pegna G. Exploratory research of solid freeform construction. Automation in Construction. 1997. Vol. 5. Iss. 5, pp. 427–437. EDN: AKMYUN. htps://doi.orgt /10.1016/50926-5805(96)00166-5
6. Khorramshahi M., Mokhtari A. Automatic construction by contour crafting technology. Italian Journal of Science & Engineering. 2017. Vol. 1. No. 1, pp. 28–33.
htps://doi.orgt/10.28991/esj-2017-01113
7. Chadha U., Abrol A., Vora N., Tiwari A., Kirubaa S., Kumaran S. Performance evaluation of 3D printing technologies: a review, recent advances, current challenges, and future directions. Progress in Additive Manufacturing. 2022. Vol. 7, pp. 853–886. EDN: MSARBZ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-021-00257-4
8. Es-sebytyi H., Igouzal M., Ferretti E. Improving stability of an ecological 3D-printed house – a case study in Italy. Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering. 2022. 111/1, pp. 18–25. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.7041
9. Hoenerloh A., Nicholas P. A 3D printable Biopolymer Composite incorporating Kombucha SCOBY: Towards a locally adaptive architecture using living biomaterials. Research Directions: Biotechnology Design. 2024. 10 p. https://doi.org/10.33774/coe-2024-t3ldq
10. Moshood T.D., Nawanir G., Mahmud F., Mohamad F., Ahmad M.H., AbdulGhan A. Sustainability of biodegradable plastics: new problem or solution to solve the global plastic pollution? Current Research in Green and Sustainable Chemistry. 2022. 5. EDN: LEVBCJ.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crgsc.2022.100273
11. Labuda I., Pugliese F., Dzwierzynska J. An innovative concept for 3D sand-printed sustainable refugee shelters in a sandy desert in a hot and dry climate. Sustainability. 2024. 16 (6). 2294. EDN: FTMKEB. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062294
12. Chen D., Heyer S., Ibbotson S., Salonitis K., Steingrímsson J.G., Thiede S. Direct digital manufacturing: definition, evolution, and sustainability implications. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2015. Vol. 107, pp. 615–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.009
2. Singh R., Sodhi A.K., Bhanot N. Investigation on the potential use of EAF dust and RSA for sustainable. Recycled Waste Materials. 2019, pp. 127–135.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7017-5_15
3. Javaid M., Haleem A. Current status and applications of additive manufacturing in dentistry: a literature-based revie. Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research. 2019. 9, pp. 179–185.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2019.04.004
4. Iftekar S.F., Aabid A., Amir A., Baig M. Advancements and limitations in 3D printing materials and technologies: a critical review. Polymers. 2023. 15 (11). 2519. EDN: BFZPAW.
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15112519
5. Pegna G. Exploratory research of solid freeform construction. Automation in Construction. 1997. Vol. 5. Iss. 5, pp. 427–437. EDN: AKMYUN. htps://doi.orgt /10.1016/50926-5805(96)00166-5
6. Khorramshahi M., Mokhtari A. Automatic construction by contour crafting technology. Italian Journal of Science & Engineering. 2017. Vol. 1. No. 1, pp. 28–33.
htps://doi.orgt/10.28991/esj-2017-01113
7. Chadha U., Abrol A., Vora N., Tiwari A., Kirubaa S., Kumaran S. Performance evaluation of 3D printing technologies: a review, recent advances, current challenges, and future directions. Progress in Additive Manufacturing. 2022. Vol. 7, pp. 853–886. EDN: MSARBZ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-021-00257-4
8. Es-sebytyi H., Igouzal M., Ferretti E. Improving stability of an ecological 3D-printed house – a case study in Italy. Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering. 2022. 111/1, pp. 18–25. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.7041
9. Hoenerloh A., Nicholas P. A 3D printable Biopolymer Composite incorporating Kombucha SCOBY: Towards a locally adaptive architecture using living biomaterials. Research Directions: Biotechnology Design. 2024. 10 p. https://doi.org/10.33774/coe-2024-t3ldq
10. Moshood T.D., Nawanir G., Mahmud F., Mohamad F., Ahmad M.H., AbdulGhan A. Sustainability of biodegradable plastics: new problem or solution to solve the global plastic pollution? Current Research in Green and Sustainable Chemistry. 2022. 5. EDN: LEVBCJ.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crgsc.2022.100273
11. Labuda I., Pugliese F., Dzwierzynska J. An innovative concept for 3D sand-printed sustainable refugee shelters in a sandy desert in a hot and dry climate. Sustainability. 2024. 16 (6). 2294. EDN: FTMKEB. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062294
12. Chen D., Heyer S., Ibbotson S., Salonitis K., Steingrímsson J.G., Thiede S. Direct digital manufacturing: definition, evolution, and sustainability implications. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2015. Vol. 107, pp. 615–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.009
Для цитирования: Пшеничникова К.А. Быстровозводимые 3D-объекты: устойчивые решения в условиях многофакторных рисков // Жилищное строительство. 2025. № 5. С. 3–11. https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2025-5-3-11