Urban Planning Regulation Principles in the Countries of East and South-East Asia

The article is an analysis of the settlement systems development of East Asian countries from the point of view of the adopted measures of urban planning regulation and their resulting effect on the spatial populated areas development. A sample of countries with the greatest potential for identifying various representative principles of urban planning regulation and geographical dispersion – China, Japan and Singapore – was taken for the study. The time range of the analysis is from the 80s of the XX century to the 20s of the XXI century, corresponding to the period of the most active urbanization in the countries of East Asia, influenced by domestic urban policies and global social processes. Based on the analysis, the key principles in the formation of the approach to urban planning regulation of the settlement systems development in China, Japan and Singapore are defined. To conduct a comparative analysis and assess the effectiveness and adequacy of the application of certain principles of regulation in urban planning activities in the Russian Federation, several criteria are introduced, considering the domestic specifics of urban planning activities. The study proposes an algorithm of actions to introduce and implement one of the principles compatible with Russian urban planning in the process of spatial development.

Yu.S. SEMENOV, Postgraduate Student (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.),
Ya.Yu. SOLDATENKOV, Postgraduate Student (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.),
O.A. PESLYAK, Candidate of Architecture (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)

Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (4, 2nd Krasnoarmeiskaya Street, Saint Petersburg, 190005, Russian Federation)

1. Мазаев Г., Быстрова Т. Сельское расселение: история и типология. Екатерингбург: TATLIN, 2024. 108 с.
1. Mazaev G., Bystrova T. Sel’skoe rasselenie: istoriya i tipologiya [Rural settlement: history and typology]. Yekateriningburg: TATLIN, 2024. 108 p.
2. Потапов М.А. Экономическое развитие Восточной Азии: текущее состояние и перспективы // Россия и АТР. 2020. № 3. С. 95–109. EDN: ­ACAIJK
2. Potapov M.A. Economic development of East Asia: current state and prospects. Rossia i ATR. 2020. No. 3, pp. 95–109. (In Russian). EDN: ­ACAIJK
3. Бойцов В.В. Юго-Восточная Азия и крупные регионы развивающихся стран: динамика, структура и факторы роста // Восточная аналитика. 2019. № 4. С. 7–17. EDN: ­HFLIFL
3. Boytsov V.V. South-East Asia and large regions of developing countries: dynamics, structure and growth factors. Vostochnaya analitika. 2019. No. 4, pp. 7–17. (In Russian). EDN: ­HFLIFL
4. Xue A.J., Huang C. and Jiang B. Measuring global urban complexity from the perspective of living structure. Urban Informatics. 2024. No. 3 (28), pp. 1–15. EDN: ­EYALAY.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44212-024-00059-3
5. Valibeigi M., Ashuri F. Semantic analysis of the first cities from a deconstruction perspective. Architecture and Engineering. 2020. No. 3, pp. 43–48. EDN: ­OFQQNA. https://doi.org/10.23968/2500-0055-2020-5-3-43-48
6. Mousavi S.M., Hosseininasab Sh., Mahar W.A. Buffer zone policy and its impact on the land value and the quality of the built environment in world heritage sites: the case of Kampung Jawa, Melaka, Malaysia. Architecture and Engineering. 2024. No. 1, pp. 91–102. EDN: ­CRJXJK.
https://doi.org/10.23968/2500-0055-2024-9-1-91-102
7. Моисеев Ю.М. Обоснованность ориентиров пространственного развития: вопросы граданализа // Architecture and Modern Information Technologies. 2023. № 4 (65). С. 203–214. EDN: UBDWMK. https://doi.org/10.24412/1998-4839-2023-4-203-214
7. Moiseev Yu.M. The validity of spatial development guidelines: issues of gradanalysis. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies. 2023. No. 4 (65), pp. 203–214. (In Russian). EDN: ­UBDWMK. https://doi.org/10.24412/1998-4839-2023-4-203-214
8. Милашевская А.Н. Проблемы территориального планирования России в 2020-х годах // Architecture and Modern Information Technologies. 2022. № 3 (60). С. 208–222. EDN: ­PEKEHV. https://doi.org/10.24412/1998-4839-2022-3-208-222
8. Milashevskaya A.N. Problems of territorial planning In Russia in the 2020s. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies. 2022. No. 3 (60), pp. 208–222. (In Russian). EDN: ­PEKEHV. https://doi.org/10.24412/1998-4839-2022-3-208-222