A New Concept of Using the Living Space of Historical Underground Casemated Barracks in the Kerch Fortress

Number of journal: 11-2022
Autors:

Panukhin P.V.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2022-11-51-57
УДК: 711.165

 

AbstractAbout AuthorsReferences
The article analyzes the problem of modern use of architectural objects of historical military heritage. On the example of the Reconstruction Project of of the complex of casemated barracks in the Fortress of Kerch (Republic of Crimea), examples of adaptation of the Lower and French barracks, built in the second half of the XIX century, for modern hotels of small and medium capacity are given. It is substantiated that the return of the function of housing equipped with the most modern life support systems to the underground casemated barracks of the Kerch Fortress seems to be the most natural functional filling of their space, and, in addition, an extremely relevant project in connection with the Federal Program of Import Substitution in the field of tourism.
P.V. PANUKHIN, Candidate of Architecture (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)

Moscow Institute of Architecture (State Academy) – MARKHI) (11, Rozhdestvenka Street, 107031, Moscow, Russian Federation)

1. Notes of Eduard Ivanovich Totleben during the defense of Sevastopol in 1854–1855. Voenno-istoricheskii zhurnal. 2007. No. 7, pp. 17–25. (In Russian).
2. Belik Yu.L. Krepost’ Kerch’ [Fortress of Kerch]. Kerch: Ignatov K.E. 2017. 143 p.
3. Panukhin P.V. Totleben. K 200-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya [Totleben. To the 200th anniversary of his birth]. Moscow: Architectura-S. 2018. Vol. 1. 406 p.
4. Shperk V.F. Fortifikatsiya (ocherki po istorii razvitiya) [Fortification (essays on the history of development)]. Moscow: Voenizdat, 1940.
5. Panukhin P.V. Prostranstvo i vremya na kartakh Kryma [Space and time on maps of the Crimea]. Moscow: Architectura-S. 2020. 455 p.
6. Yakovlev V.V. Evolyutsiya dolgovremennoi fortifikatsii [The evolution of long-term fortification]. Moscow: Voenizdat. 1937.
7. Panukhin P.V. Totleben. Krepost’ Kerch’ [Totleben. Fortress Kerch]. Moscow: Architectura-C. 2018.Vol. 2. 464 p.
8. Panukhin P.V. About the project of comprehensive reconstruction and functional adjustment of the architectural ensemble of the Kerch fortress near the Krymsky bridge. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2022. No. 9, pp. 18–24. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2022-9-18-24
9. Panukhin P.V. Cooperation of Peter I and N. Witsen in positioning fortifications of the time of the First and Second Azov campaigns (To the 350th anniversary of the birth of Peter the Great). Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2022. No. 8, pp. 3–10. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2022-8-3-10
10. Prokofieva I.A. The history of the trading house of the Economic society of officers on Vozdvizhenka. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2022. No. 8, pp. 11–16. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2022-8-11-16

For citation: Panukhin P.V. A new concept of using the living space of historical underground casemated barracks in the Kerch Fortress. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2022. No. 11, pp. 51–57. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2022-11-51-57


Print   Email