Renovation by City Blocks (Methodological Issues)

Number of journal: 4-2018
Autors:

Kievskiy L.V.
Kargashin M.E.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2018-4-15-25
УДК: 624

AbstractAbout AuthorsReferences
This work is devoted to an important stage of urban planning – detailing of citywide planned indicators of the territorial renovation program (by city blocks). Methodological issues concerning the nomenclature of city blocks renovation in Moscow, simulation of the renovation process, principles of the combination of city block schedules, sequence of renovation by city blocks, the use of starting sites for the “opening” of a city block, optimization of the integrated implementation schedule of the program in terms of the year limit of commissioning and the total duration of the program are considered. In the course of the study, geospatial queries and cartographical analysis were widely used. A mathematical model for determining the duration of city blocks renovation (on the basis of geometrical progression) and a set of criteria of ranking city blocks for inclusion in the citywide schedule are proposed. The concepts of a “basic” city block (with own starting sites) and a chain of city blocks, a sequence of adjacent city blocks the renovation of which will begin after the “basic” one, are introduced. A calculation module for automated formation of renovation schedules for each city block and a summary citywide schedule of implementing the renovation program by city blocks are described.
L.V. KIEVSKIY, Doctor of Sciences (Engineering), Professor, Chief Researcher (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)
M.E. KARGASHIN, Programming Supervisor

OOO NPTS “City Development” (19, str. 3, Mira Avenue, Moscow, 129090, Russian Federation)

1. Kievskiy L.V., Abyanov R.R. Evaluation of the place and birth of a building complex in the economy of Moscow. «CITY DEVELOPMENT» collection of proceedings 2006–2014. Ed. by prof. L.V. Kievskiy. Moscow: SvR-ARGUS. 2014. 592 p. (pp. 53–53). (In Russian).
2. Kievskiy L.V. Housing reform and private construction sector In Russia. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2000. No. 5, pp. 2–5. (In Russian).
3. Kievskiy L.V. Housing development and international cooperation. Promyshlennoe i grazhdanskoe stroitel’stvo. 1996. No. 4, pp. 26–27. (In Russian).
4. Tikhomirov S.A., Kievskiy L.V., Kuleshova E.I., Kostin A.V., Sergeev A.S. Modeling of town-planning process. Promyshlennoe i grazhdanskoe stroitel’stvo. 2015. No. 9, pp. 51–55. (In Russian).
5. Kievskiy L.V., Kievskaya R.L., Mareev Yu.A. The main methodical directions of the formation of urban planning rating. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2015. No. 12, pp. 3–8. (In Russian).
6. Kievskiy L.V. A mathematical model of renovation. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2018. No. 1–2, pp. 3–7. (In Russian).
7. Kievskiy L.V., Kargashin M.E., Parkhomenko M.I., Sergee-va A.A. An organizational-economic model of renovation. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2018. No. 3, pp. 47–55. (In Russian).
8. Kievskiy I.L., Pljaskina A.T. Readiness of the market of construction materials and machines of the Central Federal District of Russia for the renovation program in Moscow. Promyshlennoe i grazhdanskoe stroitel’stvo. 2017. No. 11, pp. 88–93. (In Russian).
9. Kievskiy L.V., Sergeeva A.A. Evaluation of the effects of urban development measures on the renovation of the quarters of the existing buildings in Moscow and their impact on the need for construction machines. Naukovedenie Internet journal. 2017. Vol. 9, No. 6, pp. 1–17. (In Russian).
10. Kievskiy L.V., Sergeeva A.A. Renovation planning and effective demand. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2017. No. 12, pp. 3–7. (In Russian).
11. Levkin S.I., Kievskiy L.V. Town planning aspects of the sectoral government programs. Promyshlennoe i grazhdanskoe stroitel’stvo. 2012. No. 6, pp. 26–33. (In Russian).
12. Kievskiy L.V. Kompleksnost’ i potok (organizatsiya zastroiki mikroraiona) [The complexity and the flow (organization development of the neighborhood)]. Moscow: Stroyizdat. 1987. 136 p.
13. Shul’zhenko S.N., Kievskiy L.V., Volkov A.A. Improvement of the methodology for assessing the level of organizational preparation for concentrated construction. Vestnik MGSU. 2016. No. 3, pp. 135–143. (In Russian).
14. Gusakova E.A., Pavlov A.S. Osnovy organizatsii i upravleniya v stroitel’stve [Bases of the organization and management in construction]. Moscow: Yurait. 2016. 318 p.
15. Oleinik P.P. Organizatsiya stroitel’nogo proizvodstva [Organi-zation of construction production]. Moscow: ASV. 2010. 576 p.
16. Semechkin A.E. Sistemnyi analiz i sistemotekhnika [System analysis and system engineering]. Moscow: SvR-ARGUS. 2005. 536 p.
17. Kievskiy L.V., Kievskiy I.L. Prioritizing traffic city development framework. Promyshlennoe i grazhdanskoe stroitel’stvo. 2011. No. 10, pp. 3–6. (In Russian).
18. Kievskiy L.V. Applied organization of construction. Vestnik MGSU. 2017. No. 3, pp. 253–259. (In Russian).
19. Kievskiy L.V., Kievskaya R.L. Influence of town-planning decisions on the markets of real estate. Promyshlennoe i grazhdanskoe stroitel’stvo. 2013. No. 6, pp. 27–31. (In Russian).
20. Kievskiy I.L., Grishutin I.B., Kievskiy L.V. Distributed reorganization of blocks (pre-project stage). Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2017. No. 1–2, pp. 23–28. (In Russian).

For citation: Kievskiy L.V., Kargashin M.E. Renovation by city blocks (methodological issues). Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2018. No. 4, pp. 15–25. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2018-4-15-25


Print   Email